Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ESO EHR and ImageTrend 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Practice Better
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Eldermark
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
MedTrainer
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (73.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (54.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
ESO EHR
Star Rating
(19)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (73.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ESO EHRImageTrend
Star Rating
(34)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (54.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ImageTrendSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that ESO EHR excels in ease of setup with a score of 9.3, making it a preferred choice for organizations looking to implement a new system quickly, while ImageTrend's setup score of 8.1 indicates it may require more time and resources to get started.
- Reviewers mention that ESO EHR offers superior patient care report and clinical documentation capabilities, scoring 8.3, which is crucial for emergency services, whereas ImageTrend's performance in this area is slightly lower at 8.0, suggesting it may not meet the same level of detail or usability.
- G2 users highlight that ESO EHR has a strong focus on clinical workflow management, particularly in meaningful use reporting, which is essential for compliance, while ImageTrend's offerings in this area are less emphasized, potentially impacting user satisfaction in regulatory environments.
- Users on G2 indicate that ImageTrend shines in quality of support with a score of 8.6, compared to ESO EHR's 8.2, suggesting that ImageTrend may provide more responsive and effective customer service, which is vital for users needing immediate assistance.
- Reviewers say that ESO EHR is particularly strong in ancillary care provider access, which enhances collaboration among different medical professionals, while ImageTrend's capabilities in this area are not as robust, potentially limiting interdisciplinary communication.
- Users report that both products have their strengths in billing, but ESO EHR's score of 7.4 indicates it may have more room for improvement compared to ImageTrend, which could affect financial operations for organizations relying heavily on billing functionalities.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ESO EHR
No pricing availableImageTrend
No pricing availableFree Trial
ESO EHR
No trial information availableImageTrend
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
12
8.6
33
Ease of Use
7.9
12
7.8
33
Ease of Setup
9.3
5
8.3
29
Ease of Admin
9.0
5
8.2
24
Quality of Support
8.2
10
8.6
32
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.9
24
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
12
7.9
33
Features by Category
Maintenance of Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Clinical Workflow Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Patient Health Information Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - EHR
Not enough data
Not enough data
Emergency Response
Not enough data
6.3
18
Not enough data
5.8
16
Not enough data
5.5
17
Data Management
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.3
21
Business Operations
Not enough data
7.8
17
Not enough data
6.1
17
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ESO EHR and ImageTrend are categorized as Emergency Medical Services
Unique Categories
ESO EHR is categorized as EHR
ImageTrend is categorized as Fire Department and Healthcare Compliance
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ESO EHR
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
ImageTrend
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Public Safety
31.6%
Medical Practice
21.1%
Hospital & Health Care
21.1%
Government Administration
10.5%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
5.3%
Other
10.5%
Public Safety
39.4%
Hospital & Health Care
24.2%
Government Administration
15.2%
Medical Practice
12.1%
Writing and Editing
3.0%
Other
6.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
ESO EHR has no discussions with answers
ImageTrend has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
