Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Epsilon3 and LabVIEW 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuestDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Knowby Pro
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Jaspersoft
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.1% of reviews)
Small-Business (44.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $100.00 Per Month
$493.00 Per Year
Epsilon3
Star Rating
(259)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $100.00 Per Month
Browse all 3 pricing plansLabVIEW
Star Rating
(192)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (44.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
$493.00 Per Year
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that LabVIEW excels in graphical programming with an impressive score of 8.6, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize visual development. In contrast, Epsilon3's graphical programming score is lower at 7.4, indicating that users may find LabVIEW's interface more intuitive for complex projects.
- Reviewers mention that Epsilon3 shines in ease of administration, scoring 8.6 compared to LabVIEW's 7.4. This suggests that users find Epsilon3 more manageable for ongoing operations, which can be crucial for teams looking to streamline their workflow.
- G2 users highlight the superior quality of support for Epsilon3, with a score of 8.8, while LabVIEW's support quality is rated at 8.0. This difference indicates that users may feel more confident in Epsilon3's customer service and assistance when issues arise.
- Users on G2 report that Epsilon3 offers better product direction with a positive score of 8.5, compared to LabVIEW's 6.5. This suggests that Epsilon3 is perceived as more innovative and responsive to user needs, which can be a significant factor for long-term investment.
- Reviewers mention that LabVIEW's templates score highly at 8.1, providing users with a robust starting point for their projects. However, Epsilon3's workflows and procedures both score 8.5, indicating that users may find Epsilon3's process management features more flexible and adaptable to their specific needs.
- Users say that while both products offer generative AI features, LabVIEW's AI text generation is rated at 8.0, whereas Epsilon3's is lower at 7.1. This suggests that LabVIEW may provide more advanced capabilities in this area, appealing to users looking for enhanced automation in their workflows.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Epsilon3
BASIC
Starting at $100.00
Per Month
$100 per user per month, billed annually.
- Create & Run Procedures
- Basic Insights & Analytics
- Secure & Compliant Cloud Storage
LabVIEW
LabVIEW Base
$493.00
Per Year
- Recommended for desktop measurement applications
- Includes device drivers for NI hardware and third-party instruments
- Includes basic mathematics and signal processing
Free Trial
Epsilon3
Free Trial is available
LabVIEW
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.1
243
8.6
146
Ease of Use
7.8
250
8.3
146
Ease of Setup
8.1
110
7.4
22
Ease of Admin
8.7
35
7.5
20
Quality of Support
8.8
185
8.0
129
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
39
7.7
20
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
249
6.5
135
Features by Category
Reports
7.5
18
Not enough data
7.4
17
Not enough data
7.6
18
Not enough data
7.0
18
Not enough data
7.4
18
Not enough data
Self Service
7.5
17
Not enough data
7.3
18
Not enough data
6.5
18
Not enough data
6.7
18
Not enough data
7.3
17
Not enough data
6.9
18
Not enough data
Advanced Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Building Reports
7.1
17
Not enough data
7.5
17
Not enough data
7.2
17
Not enough data
7.0
17
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reports
7.5
18
Not enough data
7.4
17
Not enough data
7.6
18
Not enough data
7.0
18
Not enough data
7.4
18
Not enough data
Self Service
7.5
17
Not enough data
7.3
18
Not enough data
6.5
18
Not enough data
6.7
18
Not enough data
7.3
17
Not enough data
6.9
18
Not enough data
Building Reports
7.1
17
Not enough data
7.5
17
Not enough data
7.2
17
Not enough data
7.0
17
Not enough data
Planning
6.3
12
Not enough data
6.5
12
Not enough data
6.3
12
Not enough data
6.4
12
Not enough data
Scheduling
6.5
12
Not enough data
6.7
12
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Advanced Planning and Scheduling (APS)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Workflow & Automation
8.1
27
Not enough data
8.5
28
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution
7.8
27
Not enough data
7.9
26
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
Analytics & Reporting
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.2
26
Not enough data
7.7
25
Not enough data
Enterprise Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Knowledge Capture
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.4
14
Not enough data
7.7
14
Not enough data
7.3
14
Not enough data
Agentic AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data & Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Planning
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Optimization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Guide Options
7.4
112
Not enough data
7.7
120
Not enough data
7.6
115
Not enough data
7.4
103
Not enough data
7.8
125
Not enough data
Guide Tools
7.8
116
Not enough data
8.1
124
Not enough data
7.9
108
Not enough data
7.8
109
Not enough data
Access Options
7.1
95
Not enough data
6.9
105
Not enough data
8.6
124
Not enough data
Task Tracking
7.7
99
Not enough data
7.7
90
Not enough data
8.4
121
Not enough data
Checklist Options
7.9
98
Not enough data
7.4
86
Not enough data
7.7
91
Not enough data
Software Availability
7.3
97
Not enough data
7.9
111
Not enough data
6.5
85
Not enough data
8.2
111
Not enough data
Systems Modeling
7.2
6
7.0
11
7.6
7
6.1
12
8.8
7
7.8
22
7.4
7
8.6
35
8.3
7
8.8
35
Requirements
8.1
7
7.9
24
8.6
7
7.9
25
8.6
7
8.0
23
Collaboration
7.4
7
7.9
25
7.4
7
6.4
20
Debugging
8.1
7
8.2
36
7.6
7
8.1
37
Generative AI
8.0
10
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
Process Management
8.1
31
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.2
29
Not enough data
7.6
26
Not enough data
7.2
26
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.9
30
Not enough data
Customization
8.1
36
Not enough data
7.8
34
Not enough data
8.0
35
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.6
30
Not enough data
Collaboration
7.9
34
Not enough data
8.3
33
Not enough data
8.0
35
Not enough data
8.0
34
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Business Process Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Process Development
7.9
27
Not enough data
Production Control - Manufacturing Execution System (MES)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Production Monitoring - Manufacturing Execution System (MES)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Collection and Analysis - Manufacturing Execution System (MES)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - Manufacturing Execution System (MES)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Artificial Intelligence - Manufacturing Execution System (MES)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Manufacturing Execution System
Not enough data
Not enough data
Statistical Tool
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Decision Making
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Knowledge Base
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Epsilon3 and LabVIEW are categorized as Systems Engineering And MBSE
Unique Categories
Epsilon3 is categorized as Standard Operating Procedures, Manufacturing Execution System, Work Instructions, Connected Worker Platform, Time Series Intelligence, Time Series Databases, Advanced Planning and Scheduling (APS), Embedded Business Intelligence, Predictive Analytics, Business Process Management, and Resource Management
LabVIEW has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Epsilon3
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
LabVIEW
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Aviation & Aerospace
35.0%
Financial Services
19.1%
Information Technology and Services
10.5%
Defense & Space
5.4%
Banking
4.7%
Other
25.3%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
10.9%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
10.4%
Research
9.8%
Higher Education
9.8%
Industrial Automation
7.7%
Other
51.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
Epsilon3 has no discussions with answers
How useful do you think labVIEW would be in programming and calibrating open source medical ventilators that are used for corona cases?
2 Comments
DK
LabVIEW is fabulous!! It is easy to use and many moons ago I used LabVIEW for a product called RespiCal which was a ventilator calibrator. It was sold by...Read more
Which language is used in LabVIEW?
2 Comments
AK
LabVIEW primarily uses a graphical programming language called G (or LabVIEW G). Instead of traditional text-based code, you create programs using a visual...Read more
What is LabVIEW used for?
2 Comments
AK
LabVIEW (Laboratory Virtual Instrument Engineering Workbench) is a system-design platform and development environment used primarily for data acquisition,...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
