Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare EMQX and Portainer 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Komodor
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
1oT
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (82.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Pay As You Go Per Year
$0.00 3 Nodes Per Month
EMQX
Star Rating
(22)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
Pay As You Go Per Year
Browse all 5 pricing plansPortainer
Star Rating
(283)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (82.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 3 Nodes Per Month
Learn more about PortainerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Portainer excels in ease of use with a score of 9.6, making it highly accessible for small businesses, while EMQX, with a score of 9.2, is noted for its more complex setup process, which may require additional technical expertise.
- Reviewers mention that Portainer's dashboard functionality is rated at 9.7, providing a user-friendly interface for managing containers, whereas EMQX's dashboard, while functional, does not receive the same level of praise, indicating potential areas for improvement in user experience.
- G2 users highlight Portainer's strong performance in system integration with a perfect score of 10.0, allowing seamless connections with various applications, while EMQX, although capable, scores lower in this area, suggesting it may not integrate as effortlessly with other systems.
- Users on G2 report that Portainer's management features, particularly in access control and network isolation, are robust, scoring 9.4 and 9.5 respectively, which is crucial for maintaining security in containerized environments. In contrast, EMQX's security features, while adequate, score lower at 8.7, indicating a potential gap in security management capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Portainer's scalability is rated at 9.1, making it a preferred choice for businesses looking to grow, while EMQX, with a score of 8.3 in predictive maintenance, may not offer the same level of proactive support for scaling operations effectively.
- Users say that Portainer's overall product direction is highly rated at 9.7, reflecting a strong commitment to continuous improvement and user feedback, whereas EMQX's perfect score of 10.0 in this area suggests it is also focused on evolving its offerings, but the lower overall ratings in other categories may impact user confidence in its future development.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
EMQX
EMQX Cloud （Standard）
Pay As You Go
Per Year
NO Coding, Saas & On-premise solution.Billed Hourly: Start at $ 0.18 per hour
- Scale as you need, pay as you go
- Flexible and rich IoT data integration up to 30+ choices
- Run in 17 regions across AWS, GCP, and Microsoft Azure
Portainer
Portainer Business - 3 Nodes Free
$0.00
3 Nodes Per Month
Portainer Business is our fully featured, fully supported business product. It is used by some of the largest organizations in the world to deliver a powerful Kubernetes and Docker container management experience for DevOps and IT teams. With more than 650,000 active users, Portainer is proven to be the simplest and most effective way of adopting and managing Kubernetes, and Docker/Swarm environments.
- https://www.portainer.io/take-3
Free Trial
EMQX
Free Trial is available
Portainer
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
10
9.3
238
Ease of Use
9.2
10
9.5
241
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.5
192
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.6
175
Quality of Support
8.3
10
9.1
152
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.5
133
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
10
9.7
231
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Message Queue (MQ)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Design
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Control
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Systems Management
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
10.0
6
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.4
6
IoT Capabilities
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Agentic AI - Industrial IoT
Not enough data
Not enough data
Edge
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Operations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Simplification - Internal Developer Platform
Not enough data
8.6
20
Not enough data
9.3
20
Not enough data
8.8
20
Automation - Internal Developer Platform
Not enough data
8.5
20
Not enough data
9.0
20
Management
Not enough data
9.3
186
Not enough data
9.2
175
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Organization
Not enough data
9.0
171
Not enough data
9.2
195
Not enough data
9.1
176
Development
Not enough data
8.7
142
Not enough data
9.1
169
Not enough data
8.8
140
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
EMQX and Portainer are categorized as Industrial IoT
Unique Categories
Portainer is categorized as Internal Developer Platforms, IoT Edge Platforms, and Container Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
EMQX
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Portainer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
27.3%
Hospitality
13.6%
Online Media
9.1%
Financial Services
9.1%
Wholesale
4.5%
Other
36.4%
Information Technology and Services
20.9%
Computer Software
19.8%
Computer & Network Security
6.5%
Program Development
3.2%
Computer Networking
3.2%
Other
46.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
EMQX has no discussions with answers
What is Portainer used for?
3 Comments
AH
Managing and deploying docker containers.Read more
What is the difference between Portainer and Portainer CE?
3 Comments
AH
Portainer CE is the community edition.Read more
Can Portainer manage Swarm?
3 Comments
MP
Yes, Portainer has built-in management capabilities for both Swarm and Kubernetes.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
