Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Eclipse AspectJ and Mockito 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (34.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (38.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Eclipse AspectJ
Star Rating
(24)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (34.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Eclipse AspectJMockito
Star Rating
(22)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (38.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MockitoSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Mockito excels in its ease of setup, scoring a perfect 9.0, which reviewers mention makes it a go-to choice for developers looking to implement unit testing quickly. In contrast, Eclipse AspectJ does not have a specific score for ease of setup, indicating potential challenges in getting started.
- Reviewers mention that Mockito has a strong focus on meeting requirements with a score of 8.3, while Eclipse AspectJ outperforms it with a score of 8.8, suggesting that AspectJ may offer more comprehensive features for aspect-oriented programming that align better with user needs.
- Users on G2 highlight that Mockito's quality of support is rated at 7.7, which some reviewers say could be improved, whereas Eclipse AspectJ has a higher support rating of 8.1, indicating a more reliable support experience for users facing issues.
- G2 users report that Mockito shines in its ease of administration, also scoring a perfect 9.0, which reviewers say allows for straightforward management of testing processes. Eclipse AspectJ, however, does not provide specific scores in this area, which may suggest a more complex administrative experience.
- Reviewers mention that while Mockito has a solid product direction score of 7.3, Eclipse AspectJ significantly outperforms it with a score of 8.8, indicating that users feel more confident in the future development and enhancements of AspectJ.
- Users say that Mockito is particularly favored in mid-market segments, with 38.9% of reviews coming from this demographic, while Eclipse AspectJ is more popular among small businesses, as indicated by 34.8% of its reviews, suggesting different target audiences and use cases for each product.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Eclipse AspectJ
No pricing availableMockito
No pricing availableFree Trial
Eclipse AspectJ
No trial information availableMockito
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
21
8.3
14
Ease of Use
8.4
21
7.9
14
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.0
5
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.0
5
Quality of Support
8.1
16
7.7
13
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.0
5
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
20
7.3
13
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Eclipse AspectJ and Mockito are categorized as Java Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
Eclipse AspectJ has no unique categories
Mockito has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Eclipse AspectJ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Mockito
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
13.0%
Computer Software
13.0%
Computer & Network Security
13.0%
Banking
8.7%
Telecommunications
4.3%
Other
47.8%
Information Technology and Services
22.2%
Computer Software
22.2%
Financial Services
11.1%
Military
5.6%
Marketing and Advertising
5.6%
Other
33.3%
Discussions
Eclipse AspectJ has no discussions with answers
Mockito has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
