Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Eclipse AspectJ and JHipster

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Eclipse AspectJ
Eclipse AspectJ
Star Rating
(24)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (34.8% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Eclipse AspectJ
JHipster
JHipster
Star Rating
(97)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (62.7% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about JHipster
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that JHipster excels in its ease of use, with a score of 8.7, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a straightforward development experience. In contrast, Eclipse AspectJ, while still user-friendly, has a slightly lower score of 8.4, indicating that some users find it a bit more complex to navigate.
  • Reviewers mention that JHipster's strong community support is a significant advantage, with a total of 83 reviews highlighting its active user base and extensive documentation. Eclipse AspectJ, with only 23 reviews, may not offer the same level of community engagement, which can be crucial for troubleshooting and learning.
  • G2 users indicate that JHipster's administration console is intuitive and well-designed, allowing for efficient task management and access control. In contrast, users on G2 report that Eclipse AspectJ's administration features are less robust, which can lead to challenges in managing complex projects.
  • Reviewers say that JHipster shines in its integration with modern JavaScript frameworks, making it a go-to choice for developers looking to build responsive web applications. Eclipse AspectJ, while powerful in aspect-oriented programming, does not focus on front-end frameworks, which may limit its appeal for full-stack development.
  • Users report that JHipster's automated provisioning capabilities are highly praised, streamlining the deployment process for developers. Eclipse AspectJ, however, lacks comprehensive automation features, which can result in a more manual and time-consuming deployment experience.
  • Reviewers mention that JHipster's product direction is viewed positively, with a score of 8.7, indicating a strong commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates. Eclipse AspectJ, with a similar score of 8.8, also shows promise, but some users feel that its updates are less frequent, which could impact long-term viability.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Eclipse AspectJ
No pricing available
JHipster
No pricing available
Free Trial
Eclipse AspectJ
No trial information available
JHipster
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
21
8.5
66
Ease of Use
8.4
21
8.7
66
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.1
33
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.5
33
Quality of Support
8.1
16
7.9
60
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
7.5
25
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
20
8.7
62
Features by Category
Cloud Infrastructure AutomationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
IT Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
JavaScript Web FrameworksHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
JavaScript Frameworks
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Eclipse AspectJ
Eclipse AspectJ
JHipster
JHipster
Eclipse AspectJ and JHipster are categorized as Java Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
Eclipse AspectJ
Eclipse AspectJ has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Eclipse AspectJ
Eclipse AspectJ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
34.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
34.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
30.4%
JHipster
JHipster
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
62.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
25.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
12.0%
Reviewers' Industry
Eclipse AspectJ
Eclipse AspectJ
Information Technology and Services
13.0%
Computer Software
13.0%
Computer & Network Security
13.0%
Banking
8.7%
Telecommunications
4.3%
Other
47.8%
JHipster
JHipster
Computer Software
30.1%
Information Technology and Services
19.3%
Telecommunications
3.6%
Hospital & Health Care
3.6%
Government Administration
3.6%
Other
39.8%
Alternatives
Eclipse AspectJ
Eclipse AspectJ Alternatives
spring.io
spring.io
Add spring.io
Grails
Grails
Add Grails
Spark
Spark
Add Spark
JUnit
JUnit
Add JUnit
JHipster
JHipster Alternatives
Vaadin
Vaadin
Add Vaadin
Jmix
Jmix
Add Jmix
spring.io
spring.io
Add spring.io
Syncfusion Essential Studio®
Syncfusion Essential Studio®
Add Syncfusion Essential Studio®
Discussions
Eclipse AspectJ
Eclipse AspectJ Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Eclipse AspectJ has no discussions with answers
JHipster
JHipster Discussions
Using external db
1 Comment
SV
You need to update application-dev.yml (depending upon your profile) with external postgresdb and build docker image and run with that profile. Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
JHipster has no more discussions with answers