Link copied to clipboard # D&B Hoovers vs LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/dun-bradstreet-d-b-hoovers/lexisnexis-prospect-portfolio/export.csv) D&B HooversProspect Portfolio™[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **D&B Hoovers** Free Trial No pricing available **LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio** No pricing available **Pricing Insights** from reviews Perceived Cost **D&B Hoovers** $$$$$ **LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio** Not enough reviews yet Average Discount **D&B Hoovers** 11% **LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio** Not enough reviews yet Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience. See it for free Time to Implement **D&B Hoovers** 6 months Based on 100 responses **LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio** 6 months Based on 100 responses Return on Investment **D&B Hoovers** 6 months Based on 100 responses **LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Pros & Cons** from reviews **D&B Hoovers** [ Ease of Use (51) ](https://www.g2.com/products/dun-bradstreet-d-b-hoovers/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1573696&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Contact Information (50) ](https://www.g2.com/products/dun-bradstreet-d-b-hoovers/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1575558&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Outdated Data (32) ](https://www.g2.com/products/dun-bradstreet-d-b-hoovers/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1574200&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Inaccurate Data (24) ](https://www.g2.com/products/dun-bradstreet-d-b-hoovers/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1575313&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) **LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio** [ Lead Generation (2) ](https://www.g2.com/products/lexisnexis-prospect-portfolio/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2248978&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ CRM Integration (1) ](https://www.g2.com/products/lexisnexis-prospect-portfolio/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2248922&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Learning Curve (1) ](https://www.g2.com/products/lexisnexis-prospect-portfolio/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2248950&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Outdated Contacts (1) ](https://www.g2.com/products/lexisnexis-prospect-portfolio/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2248987&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) Screenshots **D&B Hoovers** ![D&B Hoovers screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/117693/Hoovers---Desktop.PNG) **LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio** ![LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/5203/large_ProspectPortfolio.jpg) **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **D&B Hoovers** **7.9** /10 Based on 659 responses **LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio** **8.2** /10 Based on 14 responses Ease of Use **D&B Hoovers** **8.3** /10 Based on 668 responses **LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio** **8.1** /10 Based on 14 responses Ease of Setup **D&B Hoovers** **8.4** /10 Based on 283 responses **LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio** **7.6** /10 Based on 7 responses Ease of Admin **D&B Hoovers** **8.1** /10 Based on 184 responses **LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio** **7.7** /10 Based on 5 responses Quality of Support **D&B Hoovers** **8.0** /10 Based on 561 responses **LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio** **8.2** /10 Based on 12 responses Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **D&B Hoovers** **8.1** /10 Based on 183 responses **LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio** Not enough data Product Direction (% positive) **D&B Hoovers** **7.2** /10 Based on 649 responses **LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio** **5.8** /10 Based on 14 responses **Features** ratings from reviews Sales Intelligence **7.6** /10 Based on 539 responses **7.8** /10 Based on 8 responses AI Sales Assistant **8.3** /10 Based on 65 responses Not enough data User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 31.5% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 30.7% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 37.8% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 31.5% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 30.7% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 37.8% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 13.3% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 60.0% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 26.7% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 13.3% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 60.0% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 26.7% **Reviewers' Industry** [![D&B Hoovers](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1513352418/dun-bradstreet-d-b-hoovers.svg "D&B Hoovers")](https://www.g2.com/products/dun-bradstreet-d-b-hoovers/reviews) D&B Hoovers Computer Software 15.2% Information Technology and Services 10.4% Financial Services 8.3% Consumer Services 5.3% Internet 4.5% Other 56.3% [![LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_86a486db34c03441ef1a31345a184741/lexisnexis-prospect-portfolio.gif "LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio")](https://www.g2.com/products/lexisnexis-prospect-portfolio/reviews) LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio Telecommunications 12.5% Higher Education 12.5% Computer Software 12.5% Consulting 6.3% Supermarkets 6.3% Other 50.0% Alternatives **D&B Hoovers Alternatives** ![Apollo.io](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/774372bf572eb33280b101482ce703b9/apollo-io.svg "Apollo.io") [ Apollo.io ](/products/apollo-io/reviews) ![GTM Workspace - Powered by ZoomInfo](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/36867c47db8f838807091d68c3f2f753/gtm-workspace-powered-by-zoominfo.svg "GTM Workspace - Powered by ZoomInfo") [ GTM Workspace - Powered by ZoomInfo ](/products/gtm-workspace-powered-by-zoominfo/reviews) ![Lusha](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/6876404e301dabd0ecc3ea2525b2fedd/lusha.svg "Lusha") [ Lusha ](/products/lusha/reviews) ![Lead411](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/b278674caab2afd14b15e04782404033/lead411.svg "Lead411") [ Lead411 ](/products/lead411/reviews) **LexisNexis Prospect Portfolio Alternatives** ![GTM Workspace - Powered by ZoomInfo](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/36867c47db8f838807091d68c3f2f753/gtm-workspace-powered-by-zoominfo.svg "GTM Workspace - Powered by ZoomInfo") [ GTM Workspace - Powered by ZoomInfo ](/products/gtm-workspace-powered-by-zoominfo/reviews) ![LinkedIn Sales Navigator](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1487565470/linkedin-sales-navigator.svg "LinkedIn Sales Navigator") [ Sales Navigator ](/products/linkedin-sales-navigator/reviews) ![Salesgenie by Data Axle](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_98d1e8163292d4b32fe6fa63726bd969/salesgenie-by-data-axle.png "Salesgenie by Data Axle") [ Salesgenie by Data Axle ](/products/salesgenie-by-data-axle/reviews) ![Lead411](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/b278674caab2afd14b15e04782404033/lead411.svg "Lead411") [ Lead411 ](/products/lead411/reviews) ## D&B Hoovers vs Prospect Portfolio™ FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 16, 2026 ### What is the difference between D&B Hoovers vs Prospect Portfolio™? D&B Hoovers and Prospect Portfolio™ differ most clearly in review volume, with D&B Hoovers having a much larger user base and more reviewer-cited strengths in data accuracy and search capabilities. | [D&B Hoovers](https://www.g2.com/products/dun-bradstreet-d-b-hoovers/reviews) | [Prospect Portfolio™](https://www.g2.com/products/lexisnexis-prospect-portfolio/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.1/5 (782 reviews) | 4.2/5 (16 reviews) | | — | — | | 8.4 | 7.6 | | 8.0 | 8.2 | | Data Accuracy (36 all-time mentions) | Lead Generation (2 all-time mentions) | ### How do the pricing models of D&B Hoovers and Prospect Portfolio™ compare? Prospect Portfolio™ is rated higher for value, with reviewers expressing greater satisfaction with its pricing. - **D&B Hoovers:** Reviewers frequently mention that the pricing feels high, especially for startups and small businesses, and cite frustration with credit expiration and perceived value. - **Prospect Portfolio™:** Reviewers describe it as ranking in the middle compared to other vendors, with some wishing it cost less but generally expressing satisfaction with its value. - **Switching reasons:** Recent D&B Hoovers reviewers cite switching away due to pricing concerns and credit expiration policies. ### What are the best alternatives to D&B Hoovers and Prospect Portfolio™? The top three alternatives to D&B Hoovers and Prospect Portfolio™ are Apollo.io, GTM Workspace - Powered by ZoomInfo, and Lusha. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [D&B Hoovers](https://www.g2.com/products/dun-bradstreet-d-b-hoovers/reviews) | 4.1/5 (782 reviews) | — | Pricing feels high for startups and small businesses | Data Accuracy (36 all-time mentions) | | [Prospect Portfolio™](https://www.g2.com/products/lexisnexis-prospect-portfolio/reviews) | 4.2/5 (16 reviews) | — | Ranks in the middle compared to other vendors | Lead Generation (2 all-time mentions) | | [Apollo.io](https://www.g2.com/products/apollo-io/reviews) | 4.7/5 (9793 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Comprehensive contact database | | [GTM Workspace - Powered by ZoomInfo](https://www.g2.com/products/gtm-workspace-powered-by-zoominfo/reviews) | 4.5/5 (9110 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | Robust data enrichment | | [Lusha](https://www.g2.com/products/lusha/reviews) | 4.3/5 (1665 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | Accurate contact information | ### Which Sales Intelligence features should I prioritize when comparing D&B Hoovers and Prospect Portfolio™? Buyers should prioritize Search, Data Accuracy, Integrations, Lead Generation, and Ease of Use when comparing D&B Hoovers and Prospect Portfolio™. - **Search:** D&B Hoovers offers Search as a feature, with 13 all-time mentions of inefficient search functionality; Prospect Portfolio™ does not list Search as a feature. - **Data Accuracy:** D&B Hoovers has 36 all-time mentions for Data Accuracy; Prospect Portfolio™ has recent mentions of outdated data but no all-time count above the publish floor. - **Integrations:** D&B Hoovers has 14 all-time mentions for Integrations; Prospect Portfolio™ is cited for Salesforce Integration in recent reviews. - **Lead Generation:** D&B Hoovers has 20 all-time mentions for Lead Generation; Prospect Portfolio™ has 2 all-time mentions. - **Ease of Use:** D&B Hoovers has 51 all-time mentions for Ease of Use; Prospect Portfolio™ has recent positive sentiment but only 1 all-time mention. ### What are the pros and cons of D&B Hoovers vs Prospect Portfolio™? D&B Hoovers' headline strength is data accuracy, while Prospect Portfolio™ is most noted for lead generation and CRM integration. - **D&B Hoovers strengths:** Data Accuracy (36 all-time mentions), Ease of Use (51 all-time mentions), Contact Information (50 all-time mentions), Features (23 all-time mentions), Lead Generation (20 all-time mentions), Integrations (14 all-time mentions). - **D&B Hoovers trade-offs:** Outdated Data (32 all-time mentions), Inaccurate Data (24 all-time mentions), Missing Features (18 all-time mentions), Inefficient Search Functionality (13 all-time mentions), Poor Filtering (13 all-time mentions), Pricing concerns in recent reviews. - **Prospect Portfolio™ strengths:** Lead Generation (2 all-time mentions), CRM Integration and Salesforce Integration cited in recent reviews, Ease of Use noted in recent reviews. - **Prospect Portfolio™ trade-offs:** Learning Curve, Outdated Contacts, Outdated Data, and Outdated Information cited in recent reviews. ### Is D&B Hoovers or Prospect Portfolio™ better for small businesses? D&B Hoovers is better suited for small businesses, with multiple recent reviews from startups and small business users highlighting its value for company registration and lead generation. - **D&B Hoovers:** Recent reviews from small business users and startups cite its effectiveness for business registration, lead generation, and data accuracy, though pricing is noted as a concern for startups. - **Prospect Portfolio™:** No segment share data available, but recent reviews highlight ease of use and CRM integration for organizing client accounts. ### Which Sales Intelligence platform has better integrations? D&B Hoovers and Prospect Portfolio™ are at parity for integrations, with both products cited for Salesforce integration in recent reviews. - **D&B Hoovers:** Salesforce integration is mentioned in recent reviews, with 14 all-time mentions for Integrations. - **Prospect Portfolio™:** Salesforce Integration is cited in recent reviews, with CRM Integration also mentioned. ### How do D&B Hoovers and Prospect Portfolio™ compare on customer support? Prospect Portfolio™ scores slightly higher on Quality of Support, but both products are rated highly by reviewers, with a difference of 0.2 points (8.2 vs 8.0). - **D&B Hoovers:** Reviewers frequently describe customer service as responsive and helpful, with 8.0 for Quality of Support and 29 all-time mentions for helpfulness. - **Prospect Portfolio™:** Reviewers highlight strong support experiences, with a Quality of Support score of 8.2 and recent reviews noting prompt and effective assistance. ### Which is easier to implement, D&B Hoovers or Prospect Portfolio™? D&B Hoovers is rated higher for Ease of Setup, with a 0.8 point advantage over Prospect Portfolio™ (8.4 vs 7.6). - **D&B Hoovers:** Reviewers consistently describe setup as quick and easy, with 14 all-time mentions for Easy Setup and multiple recent reviews citing a smooth onboarding process. - **Prospect Portfolio™:** Reviewers note that setup is generally straightforward, but some mention a learning curve and less intuitive onboarding compared to D&B Hoovers. ### Which product has better Search? D&B Hoovers is the stronger product for Search, as it is the only one of the two with Search as a feature and multiple reviewer-cited mentions. - **D&B Hoovers:** Search is a listed feature, with 13 all-time mentions of inefficient search functionality and multiple recent reviews discussing its advanced search UI and filtering capabilities. - **Prospect Portfolio™:** Search is not listed as a feature, and reviewers do not cite it as a core strength.