Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Druid and QuestDB 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CockroachDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ER/Studio
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (57.1% of reviews)
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Druid
Star Rating
(31)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (57.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about DruidQuestDB
Star Rating
(35)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about QuestDBSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Druid excels in real-time data collection with a score of 8.5, while QuestDB also performs well but is noted for its superior ease of setup, scoring 9.2. Reviewers mention that this makes QuestDB a more user-friendly option for those new to database management.
- Reviewers mention that Druid's data integration capabilities score 8.3, which is commendable, but QuestDB shines with its higher ratings in data quality and built-in data analytics, both scoring 8.7. Users on G2 appreciate the comprehensive analytics features in QuestDB that enhance data-driven decision-making.
- G2 users highlight that QuestDB offers exceptional quality of support with a score of 9.8, significantly higher than Druid's 7.9. Reviewers say that this level of support is crucial for businesses that require timely assistance and guidance.
- Users say that Druid's performance in query latency is competitive, but QuestDB's overall performance and scalability, with a score of 8.3, are often praised for handling larger workloads efficiently. Reviewers mention that this makes QuestDB a preferred choice for enterprises with growing data needs.
- Reviewers mention that Druid's auto sharding feature scores 8.7, which is beneficial for managing large datasets, while QuestDB's focus on lower data latency is frequently highlighted as a key advantage for real-time applications. Users report that this difference can impact the choice for businesses focused on immediate data processing.
- Users on G2 report that Druid's data model scores 8.8, indicating a robust structure, but QuestDB's emphasis on security features, including role-based authorization and encryption, with scores of 8.1 and 8.5 respectively, is often cited as a critical factor for organizations prioritizing data security.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Druid
No pricing availableQuestDB
No pricing availableFree Trial
Druid
Free Trial is available
QuestDB
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
20
8.9
26
Ease of Use
8.0
20
9.0
27
Ease of Setup
6.4
7
9.2
19
Ease of Admin
6.4
7
9.0
12
Quality of Support
7.9
18
9.8
25
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
5
9.4
11
Product Direction (% positive)
7.3
17
9.6
26
Features by Category
Data Management
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Performance
8.3
5
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage
8.8
10
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
Availability
8.7
9
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
8.3
10
Not enough data
Performance
8.9
9
Not enough data
Security
8.1
8
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
Support
8.8
10
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
Query latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Connectors
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scale
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Architecture
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database
8.5
10
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
Integrations
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
Platform
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
Processing
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Druid and QuestDB are categorized as Time Series Databases
Unique Categories
Druid is categorized as Real-time Analytic Database, Columnar Databases, Relational Databases, Data Warehouse, and Big Data Processing and Distribution
QuestDB has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Druid
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
QuestDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
28.6%
Telecommunications
10.7%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
10.7%
Retail
7.1%
Information Technology and Services
7.1%
Other
35.7%
Computer Software
24.2%
Financial Services
21.2%
Oil & Energy
6.1%
Information Technology and Services
6.1%
Manufacturing
3.0%
Other
39.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is it good to use Druid (for a small dataset) as an in-memory database ?
1 Comment
DG
Yes it is good for medium size data sets to big scale datasetsRead more
Druid has no more discussions with answers
QuestDB has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
