When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found DocuShare easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers felt that both vendors make it equally easy to do business overall.
Reviewers felt that DocuShare meets the needs of their business better than IBM FileNet Content Manager.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that IBM FileNet Content Manager is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of IBM FileNet Content Manager over DocuShare.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
DocuShare
No pricing available
IBM FileNet Content Manager
No pricing available
Free Trial
DocuShare
No trial information available
IBM FileNet Content Manager
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
119
8.3
92
Ease of Use
8.3
120
7.4
92
Ease of Setup
7.1
70
6.0
66
Ease of Admin
7.9
68
7.0
64
Quality of Support
7.7
109
7.8
89
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
What is the best way to optimize searches to return the correct result?
2 Comments
LW
Hi Ashley,
You can reduce the search to a collection and/or include its sub collections. One way is under ‘Advanced’ search, select to ‘Search Within’ a...Read more
How can I integrate Docushare with Microsoft Teams?
1 Comment
LW
Hi Monzelle,
Currently DocuShare does not have any features with Microsoft Teams, but now the development team is aware that this is a sought-after...Read more
How do we return to a local support team
1 Comment
SP
I am extremely happy with the support we get from our vendor, https://www.criteriafirst.com/index.php/services
When I have a question or problem, they...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.