Reviewers mention that OrCAD Capture excels in its schematic editor, scoring 9.3, which users say provides a more intuitive experience for creating complex designs compared to DipTrace's score of 8.6.
Users report that DipTrace offers superior ease of use with a score of 9.0, while OrCAD Capture's score of 7.8 indicates a steeper learning curve, making DipTrace a better choice for beginners.
G2 users highlight that OrCAD Capture's component libraries score 8.8, providing a more extensive selection of components, whereas DipTrace's libraries, scoring 8.0, may not meet the needs of users requiring a wide variety of parts.
Users on G2 mention that while both products have similar board size capabilities, DipTrace shines with a higher score of 8.7 for layers, indicating better support for complex designs with multiple layers.
Reviewers say that OrCAD Capture's quality of support, scoring 8.0, is slightly lower than DipTrace's 8.5, suggesting that users may find more responsive assistance with DipTrace when encountering issues.
Users report that OrCAD Capture's custom commands feature, scoring 7.8, allows for more flexibility in workflow customization compared to DipTrace's lower score of 6.7, which may limit advanced users looking for tailored solutions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
DipTrace
No pricing available
OrCAD Capture
No pricing available
Free Trial
DipTrace
No trial information available
OrCAD Capture
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
35
8.6
29
Ease of Use
9.0
35
7.8
29
Ease of Setup
9.0
5
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.0
5
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.5
31
7.9
26
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.