Compare Diligent Boards and LinkedIn Premium 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (42.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Diligent Boards
Star Rating
(498)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Diligent BoardsLinkedIn Premium
Star Rating
(267)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about LinkedIn PremiumSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that LinkedIn Premium excels in enhancing networking opportunities, with features like InMail allowing users to connect with professionals outside their immediate network, which has led to valuable job opportunities and sales leads.
- Users say Diligent Boards stands out for its user-friendly interface, enabling quick creation of Board books and easy document management. Reviewers appreciate that it doesn't feel cluttered, making it accessible for new users.
- According to verified reviews, LinkedIn Premium has a higher overall satisfaction score, indicating that users find it more beneficial for professional development and networking compared to Diligent Boards, which has a lower G2 Score.
- Reviewers mention that Diligent Boards offers robust security features, including end-to-end encryption, which reassures users about data safety and allows them to focus on critical issues without worrying about data breaches.
- Users highlight that while LinkedIn Premium provides valuable insights into profile views and networking potential, Diligent Boards is praised for its automation capabilities that streamline meeting management and enhance collaboration among board members.
- G2 reviewers note that customer support for Diligent Boards is highly rated, with users appreciating the responsive service, while LinkedIn Premium's support has received mixed feedback, indicating room for improvement in this area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Diligent Boards
No pricing availableLinkedIn Premium
No pricing availableFree Trial
Diligent Boards
No trial information availableLinkedIn Premium
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
449
8.1
227
Ease of Use
8.9
469
8.6
230
Ease of Setup
8.8
391
9.0
86
Ease of Admin
8.9
258
8.4
56
Quality of Support
9.0
398
7.9
182
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
248
8.4
52
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
453
7.2
228
Features by Category
Meeting Management
7.3
248
Not enough data
7.8
269
Not enough data
7.6
258
Not enough data
8.9
292
Not enough data
8.0
258
Not enough data
7.6
257
Not enough data
7.0
241
Not enough data
Board Tools
7.9
262
Not enough data
8.3
265
Not enough data
8.0
260
Not enough data
6.7
235
Not enough data
9.0
273
Not enough data
8.0
250
Not enough data
6.7
225
Not enough data
7.6
248
Not enough data
7.6
235
Not enough data
7.4
238
Not enough data
8.4
71
Not enough data
8.4
70
Not enough data
8.5
69
Not enough data
Generative AI - Board Management
6.2
33
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Board Management
4.3
14
Not enough data
4.2
14
Not enough data
5.1
14
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Social Networks
Not enough data
8.7(won by default)
14
Not enough data
8.3(won by default)
13
Agentic AI - Decision-Making
Not enough data
Not enough data
Pre-Meeting Tools
8.1
171
Not enough data
7.9
171
Not enough data
8.4
184
Not enough data
Meeting Tools
7.6
173
Not enough data
7.8
174
Not enough data
8.0
168
Not enough data
8.4
174
Not enough data
Post-Meeting Tools
7.6
162
Not enough data
7.8
160
Not enough data
7.3
152
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Meeting Management
6.0
7
Not enough data
6.0
7
Not enough data
6.2
7
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Diligent Boards and LinkedIn Premium are categorized as Social Networks
Unique Categories
LinkedIn Premium has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Diligent Boards
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
LinkedIn Premium
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Financial Services
10.6%
Banking
10.0%
Hospital & Health Care
6.3%
Non-Profit Organization Management
4.9%
Insurance
4.1%
Other
64.2%
Computer Software
17.2%
Information Technology and Services
14.1%
Marketing and Advertising
7.6%
Internet
5.0%
Staffing and Recruiting
5.0%
Other
51.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Diligent Boards used for?
2 Comments
NM
Diligent Boards is a comprehensive board management software designed to streamline and enhance the efficiency of board meetings and governance processes.Read more
Does BoardPaq charge setup fees? How long does implementation take?
2 Comments
Official Response from Diligent Board Portal
No, there are no additional fees for setup. BoardPaq uses an online signup which gives your organization instant access to your account. Implementation can...Read more
I want to keep things simple for my board initially, do I need to use all the features available?
1 Comment
Official Response from Diligent Board Portal
BoardPaq allows you to use only the features you want. Users will not see any empty sections in the app, allowing you to roll out features at your own pace.Read more
What is LinkedIn Premium used for?
1 Comment
MB
LinkedIn Premium offers additional features such as InMail credits for reaching out to people outside your network, enhanced access to job insights, the...Read more
LinkedIn Premium has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.
