Users report that Diigo excels in its collaborative workspaces, allowing teams to share and annotate resources effectively, while Pocket's collaborative features are less robust, making it more suited for individual use.
Reviewers mention that Diigo's highlighting and annotation tools are particularly useful for researchers, although some users find the interface a bit cluttered compared to Pocket's cleaner design.
G2 users highlight that Pocket offers superior offline access, enabling users to save articles and read them without an internet connection, which is a significant advantage for on-the-go users.
Users on G2 appreciate Diigo's tagging system, which allows for better organization of saved content, while Pocket's tagging capabilities are seen as less flexible and intuitive.
Reviewers say that Pocket's ease of use and setup are standout features, with many users praising its straightforward interface, whereas Diigo's learning curve can be steeper for new users.
Users report that while both products have good browser extensions, Diigo's extension is noted for its comprehensive features, including the ability to save bookmarks and highlight text directly from the browser, which some users find invaluable.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Diigo
No pricing available
Pocket
No pricing available
Free Trial
Diigo
No trial information available
Pocket
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
7
9.2
32
Ease of Use
8.1
7
9.2
33
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.3
9
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.0
5
8.5
19
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.