# DefectDojo vs Tenable Security Center Comparison | | DefectDojo | Tenable Security Center | |---|---|---| | **Star Rating** | 4.6 out of 5 | 4.6 out of 5 | | **Total Reviews** | 11 | 83 | | **Largest Market Segment** | Mid-Market (63.6% of reviews) | Enterprise (64.4% of reviews) | | **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | No pricing available | --- ## Top Pros & Cons ### DefectDojo **Not enough data** ### Tenable Security Center Pros: - Features (2 reviews) - Compliance Management (1 reviews) Cons: - Complexity (1 reviews) - Complex Queries (1 reviews) --- ## Ratings Comparison | Rating | DefectDojo | Tenable Security Center | |---|---|---| | **Meets Requirements** | 9.1 (11 reviews) | 9.2 (45 reviews) | | **Ease of Use** | 8.8 (11 reviews) | 8.6 (49 reviews) | | **Ease of Setup** | 9.2 (8 reviews) | 8.6 (43 reviews) | | **Ease of Admin** | 9.8 (8 reviews) | 8.6 (43 reviews) | | **Quality of Support** | 8.5 (10 reviews) | 8.5 (48 reviews) | | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 9.3 (7 reviews) | 8.8 (40 reviews) | | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 6.8 (11 reviews) | 8.4 (45 reviews) | --- ## Pricing ### DefectDojo #### Entry-Level Pricing No pricing available #### Free Trial No information available ### Tenable Security Center #### Entry-Level Pricing No pricing available #### Free Trial No information available --- ## Features Comparison By Category ### Vulnerability Scanner | Product | Score | Reviews | |---|---|---| | **DefectDojo** | 8.0/10 | 8 | | **Tenable Security Center** | 8.6/10 | 43 | #### Performance | Feature | DefectDojo | Tenable Security Center | |---|---|---| | **Issue Tracking** | 9.2 (8 reviews) | 8.0 (29 reviews) | | **Detection Rate** | 8.5 (8 reviews) | 8.8 (33 reviews) | | **False Positives** | 7.7 (5 reviews) | 7.9 (33 reviews) | | **Automated Scans** | 6.9 (6 reviews) | 9.1 (35 reviews) | #### Network | Feature | DefectDojo | Tenable Security Center | |---|---|---| | **Compliance Testing** | 7.6 (7 reviews) | 9.0 (29 reviews) | | **Perimeter Scanning** | 7.8 (6 reviews) | 9.1 (31 reviews) | | **Configuration Monitoring** | 8.3 (6 reviews) | 8.9 (24 reviews) | #### Application | Feature | DefectDojo | Tenable Security Center | |---|---|---| | **Manual Application Testing** | 8.6 (6 reviews) | 8.5 (19 reviews) | | **Static Code Analysis** | 7.8 (6 reviews) | 7.9 (15 reviews) | | **Black Box Testing** | 7.5 (6 reviews) | 8.3 (20 reviews) | #### Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner | Feature | DefectDojo | Tenable Security Center | |---|---|---| | **Autonomous Task Execution** | Not enough data | Not enough data | | **Proactive Assistance** | Not enough data | Not enough data | ### Risk-Based Vulnerability Management | Product | Score | Reviews | |---|---|---| | **DefectDojo** | N/A | N/A | | **Tenable Security Center** | 8.7/10 | 43 | #### Risk Analysis | Feature | DefectDojo | Tenable Security Center | |---|---|---| | **Risk Scoring** | Not enough data | 9.1 (35 reviews) | | **Reporting** | Not enough data | 8.6 (36 reviews) | | **Risk-Prioritization** | Not enough data | 9.4 (36 reviews) | #### Vulnerability Assesment | Feature | DefectDojo | Tenable Security Center | |---|---|---| | **Vulnerability Scanning** | Not enough data | 9.6 (35 reviews) | | **Vulnerability Intelligence** | Not enough data | 9.5 (35 reviews) | | **Contextual Data** | Not enough data | 9.3 (31 reviews) | | **Dashboards** | Not enough data | 8.9 (35 reviews) | #### Automation | Feature | DefectDojo | Tenable Security Center | |---|---|---| | **Automated Remediation** | Not enough data | 7.5 (21 reviews) | | **Workflow Automation** | Not enough data | 7.8 (27 reviews) | | **Security Testing** | Not enough data | 8.1 (26 reviews) | | **Test Automation** | Not enough data | 8.2 (25 reviews) | --- ## Categories **Shared Categories (1):** [Vulnerability Scanner Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/vulnerability-scanner) **Unique to Tenable Security Center (1):** [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management) --- ## Reviewer Demographics ### By Company Size | Segment | DefectDojo | Tenable Security Center | |---|---|---| | **Small-Business** | 36.4% | 13.7% | | **Mid-Market** | 63.6% | 21.9% | | **Enterprise** | 0% | 64.4% | ### By Industry #### DefectDojo - **Computer & Network Security:** 63.6% - **Information Technology and Services:** 27.3% - **Staffing and Recruiting:** 9.1% #### Tenable Security Center - **Financial Services:** 13.7% - **Banking:** 13.7% - **Computer & Network Security:** 12.3% - **Information Technology and Services:** 9.6% - **Government Administration:** 6.8% - **Education Management:** 4.1% - **Insurance:** 4.1% - **Defense & Space:** 4.1% - **Hospital & Health Care:** 4.1% - **Pharmaceuticals:** 2.7% - **Other:** 24.7% --- ## Alternatives ### Alternatives to DefectDojo - [Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-nessus/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (301 reviews) - [Snyk](https://www.g2.com/products/snyk/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (132 reviews) - [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (787 reviews) - [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (377 reviews) - [Orca Security](https://www.g2.com/products/orca-security/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (254 reviews) - [Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/products/gearset-devops/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (292 reviews) - [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (281 reviews) - [Qualys VMDR](https://www.g2.com/products/qualys-vmdr/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (167 reviews) - [Intruder](https://www.g2.com/products/intruder/reviews) — 4.8/5 stars (206 reviews) - [SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint](https://www.g2.com/products/sentinelone-singularity-endpoint/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (201 reviews) ### Alternatives to Tenable Security Center - [InsightVM (Nexpose)](https://www.g2.com/products/insightvm-nexpose/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (78 reviews) - [Qualys VMDR](https://www.g2.com/products/qualys-vmdr/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (167 reviews) - [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (787 reviews) - [Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/products/arctic-wolf/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (279 reviews) - [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (377 reviews) - [CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/products/cloudbees/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (622 reviews) - [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (217 reviews) - [Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/products/gearset-devops/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (292 reviews) - [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (281 reviews) - [SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint](https://www.g2.com/products/sentinelone-singularity-endpoint/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (201 reviews) --- ## Top Discussions ### DefectDojo No discussions available for this product. ### Tenable Security Center - Title: [What is Tenable.sc used for?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/tenable-security-center-what-is-tenable-sc-used-for) — 1 comment > **Top comment:** "Tenable products look for vulnerabilities in systems and devices. This way you can fix those before the bad gues get in. Think of it this way. Remember..." - Title: [What is the best way to break up scans so they don't use licenses up and so scans don't end up getting blocked?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/32520-what-is-the-best-way-to-break-up-scans-so-they-don-t-use-licenses-up-and-so-scans-don-t-end-up-getting-blocked) — 1 comment, 1 upvote > **Top comment:** "I would recommend to break in to groups based on your organization and run host discovery first and run asset based scanning to avoid this situation...." --- **Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/defectdojo-vs-tenable-security-center)