Users report that DatoCMS excels in automated publishing with a score of 9.3, allowing for seamless content updates, while Strapi's score of 7.9 indicates room for improvement in this area. Reviewers mention that DatoCMS's automated workflows significantly enhance efficiency.
Reviewers mention that DatoCMS offers superior multi-language support with a score of 9.6, making it a preferred choice for businesses targeting diverse markets. In contrast, Strapi's score of 7.9 suggests that its multi-language capabilities may not be as robust, which could be a limitation for global brands.
Users on G2 highlight DatoCMS's image management features, scoring 9.3, as a standout aspect, particularly for teams that rely heavily on visual content. Strapi, with a score of 7.8, is noted to have less comprehensive image management tools, which some users find limiting.
Reviewers say that DatoCMS shines in the area of reusable content, scoring 9.4, which allows for efficient content repurposing across different projects. Strapi's score of 8.7 indicates it also supports this feature, but users report that DatoCMS's implementation is more user-friendly and intuitive.
G2 users mention that DatoCMS's quality of support is rated at 9.4, with many praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. In comparison, Strapi's support, rated at 8.5, is seen as adequate but not as consistently praised, leading some users to seek additional resources.
Users report that DatoCMS's content performance analytics, scoring 9.3, provide valuable insights that help optimize content strategies, while Strapi's score of 8.3 suggests that its analytics features may not be as comprehensive, potentially hindering data-driven decision-making.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.