Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Datarails and Jet Reports 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cube
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aleph
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (72.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (76.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Datarails
Star Rating
(249)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (72.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about DatarailsJet Reports
Star Rating
(18)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Jet ReportsSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Datarails excels in data visualization with a score of 9.2, allowing for intuitive graphical representations of financial data, while Jet Reports, with a score of 8.3, offers solid visualization but lacks some of the advanced features that Datarails provides.
- Reviewers mention that Datarails has a strong custom reporting feature, scoring 9.5, which allows users to tailor reports to their specific needs, whereas Jet Reports, despite scoring well at 9.6 for custom reports, has been noted to have a steeper learning curve for creating those reports.
- G2 users highlight Datarails' superior quality of support, rated at 9.5, indicating that users feel well-supported and valued, while Jet Reports, with a score of 8.8, has received feedback suggesting that response times could be improved.
- Users on G2 report that Datarails shines in budget management with a consolidation score of 8.9, making it easier to manage multiple budgets, while Jet Reports, although competitive, has a slightly lower score of 8.4 in this area, indicating potential limitations in handling complex budget scenarios.
- Reviewers say that Datarails offers a more user-friendly setup experience, scoring 7.7, compared to Jet Reports' 8.6, which some users find to be more complex and time-consuming to implement.
- Users report that Datarails provides robust integration capabilities with a score of 9.1, making it easier to connect with other financial systems, while Jet Reports, with a score of 9.3, is also strong but has been noted to have some limitations in certain integrations that Datarails handles more seamlessly.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Datarails
No pricing availableJet Reports
No pricing availableFree Trial
Datarails
No trial information availableJet Reports
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
221
9.4
15
Ease of Use
8.0
228
8.8
17
Ease of Setup
7.6
189
8.7
14
Ease of Admin
8.3
144
8.5
9
Quality of Support
9.3
218
9.2
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
144
10.0
9
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
226
9.2
15
Features by Category
Budget Creation
9.0
148
Not enough data
8.4
134
Not enough data
8.8
133
Not enough data
8.5
143
Not enough data
7.8
111
Not enough data
8.6
137
Not enough data
Budget Management
8.7
139
Not enough data
8.3
126
Not enough data
7.9
120
Not enough data
Forecasting
8.8
135
Not enough data
8.2
126
Not enough data
8.3
124
Not enough data
8.2
123
Not enough data
6.7
87
Not enough data
Analytics
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.4
127
Not enough data
8.2
117
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Budgeting and Forecasting
7.1
32
Not enough data
7.0
32
Not enough data
7.3
33
Not enough data
Data Management
9.0
159
Feature Not Available
9.0
158
9.1
13
8.5
155
9.2
13
Reporting Structure
8.5
138
8.7
13
8.1
144
8.1
13
8.3
146
9.1
13
Standard Analytics
8.3
134
9.2
12
8.2
143
9.2
13
8.6
148
9.4
13
8.9
153
9.7
12
Custom Analytics
8.4
149
8.6
12
8.4
133
8.9
12
8.8
147
9.7
12
8.2
147
8.5
12
8.5
99
9.7
11
Agentic AI - Financial Analysis
7.1
26
Not enough data
7.0
26
Not enough data
Cash Flow Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cash Flow Forecasting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Financial Data Transfer
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Cash Flow Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reconciliation
8.8
75
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
74
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
34
Not enough data
Reporting
8.4
77
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
78
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
76
|
Verified
Not enough data
Closing Process
7.6
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.0
60
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
62
|
Verified
Not enough data
AI - Financial Close
6.1
11
Not enough data
6.4
11
Not enough data
6.2
11
Not enough data
6.3
10
Not enough data
5.9
11
Not enough data
Financial Planning
8.0
78
|
Verified
8.1
6
8.8
86
|
Verified
8.6
7
8.7
85
|
Verified
9.5
7
Agentic AI - FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis)
6.7
27
Not enough data
7.0
27
Not enough data
Financial Insight
8.2
92
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
8.0
92
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
8.0
91
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
Data
8.7
96
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
8.7
99
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
9.1
98
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
8.2
93
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
Status Communication
8.3
92
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
9.1
93
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
9.0
97
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
8.0
29
Feature Not Available
Reconciliation - Financial Reconciliation
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Audit - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integrations - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Permissions and Security - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Datarails and Jet Reports are categorized as Financial Analysis and FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis)
Unique Categories
Datarails is categorized as Budgeting and Forecasting, Financial Close, Cash Flow Management, and Financial Reconciliation
Jet Reports has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Datarails
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Jet Reports
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Financial Services
7.7%
Hospital & Health Care
6.9%
Manufacturing
5.7%
Oil & Energy
4.5%
Accounting
4.1%
Other
71.1%
Hospital & Health Care
11.8%
Food Production
11.8%
Computer Software
11.8%
Manufacturing
5.9%
Consulting
5.9%
Other
52.9%
Discussions
Datarails has no discussions with answers
Jet Reports has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
