Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Datarails and G-Accon 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cube
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aleph
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (72.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (65.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$50.00 5 QBO/Xero Companies Per Month
Datarails
Star Rating
(250)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (72.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about DatarailsG-Accon
Star Rating
(193)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (65.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$50.00 5 QBO/Xero Companies Per Month
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that G-Accon excels in data import capabilities with a score of 9.3, allowing for seamless integration with Google Sheets, while Datarails, with a score of 9.0, also offers strong data import features but lacks the same level of flexibility in connecting with various data sources.
- Reviewers mention that Datarails shines in budget hierarchies, scoring 8.3 compared to G-Accon's 7.6, indicating that Datarails provides more robust options for structuring budgets, which is crucial for mid-market companies managing complex financial scenarios.
- G2 users highlight G-Accon's superior ease of setup with a score of 8.7, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for quick deployment, whereas Datarails, with a score of 7.7, may require more time and resources to implement effectively.
- Reviewers say that Datarails offers better support quality, scoring 9.5 compared to G-Accon's 9.0, which is a significant factor for users who prioritize responsive customer service and assistance during critical financial planning processes.
- Users on G2 report that G-Accon's custom reporting features are highly rated at 9.5, allowing for tailored insights, while Datarails, scoring 8.9, provides solid custom reporting but may not match the level of personalization that G-Accon offers.
- Reviewers mention that Datarails has a stronger focus on cash flow management, with a consolidation score of 8.9 compared to G-Accon's 7.5, indicating that Datarails may be better suited for organizations that need detailed cash flow analysis and reconciliation capabilities.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Datarails
No pricing availableG-Accon
Business
$50.00
5 QBO/Xero Companies Per Month
For small business owners
- Unlimited Financial Reports
- Unlimited Accounting Data Exports/Queries
- Unlimited Bulk Imports to QuickBooks/Xero
Free Trial
Datarails
No trial information availableG-Accon
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
221
8.9
182
Ease of Use
8.0
228
8.3
186
Ease of Setup
7.6
189
8.7
110
Ease of Admin
8.3
144
8.7
73
Quality of Support
9.3
218
9.0
150
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
144
9.1
71
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
226
9.6
184
Features by Category
Budget Creation
9.0
148
9.2
92
8.4
134
7.4
87
8.8
133
7.4
86
8.5
143
7.7
86
7.8
111
7.3
83
8.6
137
7.9
86
Budget Management
8.7
139
7.9
87
8.3
126
7.4
85
7.9
120
7.8
86
Forecasting
8.8
135
8.5
84
8.2
126
7.7
78
8.3
124
7.6
77
8.2
123
7.9
77
6.7
87
5.9
43
Analytics
8.4
135
8.1
83
8.4
127
7.8
83
8.2
117
7.9
85
Agentic AI - Budgeting and Forecasting
7.1
32
5.0
6
7.0
32
4.7
6
7.3
33
4.7
6
Data Management
9.0
159
8.9
130
9.0
158
8.7
126
8.5
155
8.3
128
Reporting Structure
8.5
138
8.1
121
8.1
144
8.1
120
8.3
146
8.1
122
Standard Analytics
8.3
134
7.6
122
8.2
143
8.5
122
8.6
148
8.6
123
8.9
153
8.0
121
Custom Analytics
8.4
149
7.5
117
8.4
133
7.3
117
8.8
147
8.1
118
8.2
147
8.2
119
8.5
99
8.0
69
Agentic AI - Financial Analysis
7.1
26
4.3
5
7.0
26
4.7
5
Cash Flow Management
Not enough data
8.1
45
Not enough data
8.7
46
Not enough data
8.6
45
Cash Flow Forecasting
Not enough data
8.6
46
Not enough data
8.1
45
Not enough data
8.0
45
Not enough data
8.1
44
Not enough data
6.8
28
Analytics
Not enough data
8.4
44
Not enough data
8.7
46
Not enough data
8.3
44
Not enough data
8.0
44
Financial Data Transfer
Not enough data
8.3
45
Not enough data
8.4
43
Not enough data
8.9
45
Not enough data
8.6
46
Not enough data
8.8
46
Agentic AI - Cash Flow Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reconciliation
8.8
75
|
Verified
7.7
45
8.7
74
|
Verified
8.1
45
8.8
34
8.1
45
Reporting
8.4
77
|
Verified
8.0
46
8.1
78
|
Verified
8.0
46
8.4
76
|
Verified
8.2
46
Closing Process
7.6
61
|
Verified
7.1
45
7.0
60
|
Verified
7.3
45
7.8
62
|
Verified
7.3
45
AI - Financial Close
6.1
11
Not enough data
6.4
11
Not enough data
6.2
11
Not enough data
6.3
10
Not enough data
5.9
11
Not enough data
Financial Planning
8.0
78
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
86
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
85
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis)
6.7
27
Not enough data
7.0
27
Not enough data
Financial Insight
8.2
92
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
92
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
91
|
Verified
Not enough data
Data
8.7
96
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
99
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
98
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
93
|
Verified
Not enough data
Status Communication
8.3
92
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
93
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
97
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
29
Not enough data
Reconciliation - Financial Reconciliation
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Audit - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integrations - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Permissions and Security - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Google Workspace for Finance
Not enough data
5.6
8
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Datarails and G-Accon are categorized as Budgeting and Forecasting, Financial Analysis, Financial Close, and Cash Flow Management
Unique Categories
Datarails is categorized as FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis) and Financial Reconciliation
G-Accon is categorized as Google Workspace for Finance
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Datarails
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
G-Accon
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Financial Services
7.7%
Hospital & Health Care
6.9%
Manufacturing
5.7%
Oil & Energy
4.5%
Accounting
4.1%
Other
71.1%
Accounting
40.9%
Financial Services
8.3%
Information Technology and Services
6.2%
Marketing and Advertising
5.2%
Computer Software
4.7%
Other
34.7%
Discussions
Datarails has no discussions with answers
What is G-Accon for XERO for G Suite used for?
1 Comment
Official Response from G-Accon
Thank you for your question!
G-Accon for Xero is a bridge between your Xero accounting (also payroll, projects, assets, audit trail, etc. ) data and...Read more
G-Accon has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
