Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Darwinbox and Spine HRMS 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Teamflect
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Gem
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Greenhouse
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.3% of reviews)
Mid-Market (45.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Darwinbox
Star Rating
(174)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about DarwinboxSpine HRMS
Star Rating
(11)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Spine HRMSSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Darwinbox excels in "Time, Attendance, and PTO" management with a score of 9.1, while Spine HRMS follows closely with 8.8. Reviewers mention that Darwinbox's intuitive interface makes it easier to track employee attendance and manage leave requests efficiently.
- Reviewers mention that Darwinbox's "Performance reviews" feature, particularly the 360 Reviews, scores 9.0, indicating a robust system for gathering comprehensive feedback. In contrast, Spine HRMS scores 8.7, with users noting that while it offers customizable forms, it lacks some of the depth found in Darwinbox's review process.
- Users on G2 highlight that Darwinbox's "Employee Self Service" web portal scores an impressive 9.2, making it easy for employees to access their information and manage benefits. Spine HRMS, while functional, does not match this level of user satisfaction, scoring lower in this area.
- Reviewers say that Darwinbox's "Integration APIs" score 8.7, allowing for seamless connectivity with other business tools, which is crucial for larger enterprises. In comparison, Spine HRMS's integration capabilities are rated lower, with users expressing a desire for more robust API support.
- G2 users report that Darwinbox shines in "Goal-Setting" with a score of 9.1, enabling organizations to align individual objectives with company goals effectively. Spine HRMS, while offering goal-setting features, does not provide the same level of functionality, scoring lower in user satisfaction.
- Users report that Darwinbox's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.4, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Conversely, Spine HRMS's support is rated lower at 7.7, with some users mentioning delays in response times and less effective resolutions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Darwinbox
No pricing availableSpine HRMS
No pricing availableFree Trial
Darwinbox
No trial information availableSpine HRMS
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
113
7.9
8
Ease of Use
8.6
115
8.3
8
Ease of Setup
8.5
43
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.9
16
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.4
108
7.7
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.5
16
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
108
8.5
8
Features by Category
Core HR
8.8
37
7.6
7
8.9
39
8.8
7
7.9
34
8.7
5
8.5
36
7.9
7
8.6
33
8.6
6
8.8
34
8.6
7
Generative AI
7.2
13
Not enough data
Platform
8.4
43
Not enough data
8.5
41
Not enough data
8.1
37
Not enough data
9.0
44
Not enough data
8.9
45
Not enough data
8.4
41
Not enough data
8.8
42
Not enough data
8.9
42
Not enough data
Employee Self Service
9.1
39
Not enough data
9.0
37
Not enough data
8.9
38
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
40
Not enough data
9.0
37
Not enough data
8.3
35
Not enough data
9.0
39
Not enough data
9.0
38
Not enough data
8.4
34
Not enough data
9.0
38
Not enough data
8.7
29
Not enough data
8.4
29
Not enough data
Taxes
9.1
38
Not enough data
8.8
36
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
Integration
8.6
32
Not enough data
8.7
35
Not enough data
8.3
34
Not enough data
9.1
34
Not enough data
Platform
8.7
35
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.6
34
Not enough data
9.0
35
Not enough data
Platform Functionality
8.8
15
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
8.5
28
Not enough data
8.8
13
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Recruiting Automation
6.3
5
Not enough data
6.7
5
Not enough data
6.7
5
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Platform
8.4
43
Not enough data
8.5
41
Not enough data
8.1
37
Not enough data
9.0
44
Not enough data
8.9
45
Not enough data
8.4
41
Not enough data
8.8
42
Not enough data
8.9
42
Not enough data
Performance reviews
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.8
35
Not enough data
9.0
35
Not enough data
Goals
9.0
41
Not enough data
9.1
38
Not enough data
Feedback
8.6
35
Not enough data
8.5
36
Not enough data
8.1
32
Not enough data
8.2
29
Not enough data
Data
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.6
34
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Performance Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reports
8.6
24
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
8.4
24
Not enough data
Cleaning
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.3
14
Not enough data
6.9
14
Not enough data
6.9
14
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Sourcing
8.4
17
Not enough data
8.0
17
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Candidate Management - Applicant Tracking System
8.3
16
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
8.4
43
Not enough data
8.5
41
Not enough data
8.1
37
Not enough data
9.0
44
Not enough data
8.9
45
Not enough data
8.4
41
Not enough data
8.8
42
Not enough data
8.9
42
Not enough data
AI - Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Onboarding
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Content
7.9
28
Not enough data
8.1
30
Not enough data
7.9
30
Not enough data
8.3
31
Not enough data
8.5
34
Not enough data
8.1
33
Not enough data
Platform Additional Functionality
8.4
34
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.3
31
Not enough data
8.4
32
Not enough data
Platform Data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.7
30
Not enough data
8.8
28
Not enough data
Platform
8.4
43
Not enough data
8.5
41
Not enough data
8.1
37
Not enough data
9.0
44
Not enough data
8.9
45
Not enough data
8.4
41
Not enough data
8.8
42
Not enough data
8.9
42
Not enough data
Recruiting and Onboarding
8.5
28
Not enough data
8.7
29
Not enough data
Platform
8.4
43
Not enough data
8.5
41
Not enough data
8.1
37
Not enough data
9.0
44
Not enough data
8.9
45
Not enough data
8.4
41
Not enough data
8.8
42
Not enough data
8.9
42
Not enough data
Workforce Management Platform Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Darwinbox and Spine HRMS are categorized as Core HR
Unique Categories
Darwinbox is categorized as HR Analytics, HCM Software, Performance Management, Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), Onboarding, Payroll, and Recruiting Automation
Spine HRMS is categorized as Workforce Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Darwinbox
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Spine HRMS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
14.8%
Primary/Secondary Education
9.7%
Financial Services
9.0%
Computer Software
9.0%
Education Management
6.5%
Other
51.0%
Computer Software
27.3%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Information Services
18.2%
Staffing and Recruiting
9.1%
Program Development
9.1%
Other
18.2%
Discussions
Is Darwinbox a startup?
3 Comments
PJ
No, Darwinbox is a well-established organization that provides end-to-end HRMS solutions with a vast variety of features.Read more
Is Darwinbox a good company?
2 Comments
SP
No sure... But as the HRMS provider, they need to improve a lot. Right now they doing good but they have to make great softwareRead more
Darwinbox has no more discussions with answers
What are the features of HR software?
1 Comment
BC
HR Software is a computerized answer for overseeing and improving the everyday HR undertakings and generally HR objectives of an association. HR Software...Read more
What is purpose of HRMS software?
1 Comment
HC
It helps HR professionals in automate repetitive tasks like collecting and storing resumes, saving candidates to the talent pool, and posting jobs etc.Read more
Spine HRMS has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
