Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cypress and Tricentis qTest 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (45.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Cypress
Star Rating
(106)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansTricentis qTest
Star Rating
(100)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Tricentis qTestSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Tricentis qTest excels in test management capabilities, particularly highlighting its ability to reuse test cases. Users appreciate how this feature allows them to efficiently rerun tests with each deployment, ultimately saving time and enhancing quality.
- Users say that Cypress stands out for its ease of use and robust debugging tools. Reviewers specifically mention the effectiveness of the Testeplay feature, which enables them to interact with the DOM and analyze test snapshots, making it easier to troubleshoot issues.
- According to verified reviews, Tricentis qTest provides seamless integration with tools like Jira, which users find invaluable for maintaining real-time visibility into test execution and defects. This integration helps align QA and development teams effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Cypress benefits from a rich ecosystem of plugins and excellent documentation, making it straightforward for users to get started and find solutions to common challenges. This support is particularly appreciated by those new to automation testing.
- G2 reviewers highlight that while Tricentis qTest is strong in test variety and organization, it faces challenges in user experience compared to Cypress, which has received higher ratings for ease of setup and administration. Users find Cypress's setup process to be more intuitive and less time-consuming.
- Users report that both products have their strengths, but Cypress has a slight edge in overall user satisfaction, as reflected in its higher star rating. However, Tricentis qTest is praised for its comprehensive test management features, making it a solid choice for teams focused on structured testing processes.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cypress
OSS - Cypress Test Runner
Free
Always free and open source. No restrictions or limitations.
- http://download.cypress.io/desktop or 'npm install cypress'
Tricentis qTest
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cypress
Free Trial is available
Tricentis qTest
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
91
8.4
72
Ease of Use
9.2
92
8.4
74
Ease of Setup
9.3
18
8.0
38
Ease of Admin
9.3
14
7.9
20
Quality of Support
8.8
73
8.4
70
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
10
8.2
21
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
89
9.1
80
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
8.6
27
Not enough data
8.0
29
Not enough data
8.5
28
Management
Not enough data
8.3
28
Not enough data
8.2
27
Not enough data
8.1
26
Functionality
9.0
5
9.1
15
9.0
5
9.0
16
9.3
5
8.5
16
8.7
5
9.2
15
Automation
6.7
5
9.1
15
9.3
5
9.0
15
Not enough data
8.8
15
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.0
10
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cypress and Tricentis qTest are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cypress
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tricentis qTest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
41.7%
Information Technology and Services
20.4%
Financial Services
7.8%
Program Development
3.9%
Marketing and Advertising
2.9%
Other
23.3%
Information Technology and Services
27.1%
Computer Software
22.9%
Financial Services
7.3%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
5.2%
Hospital & Health Care
4.2%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
Are their any resources or individuals to help us connect our app authenticating with IdentityServer
1 Comment
SR
Try cy.pause, intract with app for identity and then resume. Or use api calls.Read more
How can I influence my lead QA engineer positively to to use Cypress? Cross-browser is a factor.
1 Comment
SR
Cypress 4.0 add Firefox and edge browsers.Read more
Is there a plan to add firefox to the list of supported browsers?
1 Comment
SR
Firefox and edge are supported in cypress 4.0Read more
Does qTest integrate with JIRA?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
qTest integrates with JIRA Cloud and JIRA Server, while also providing qTest Cloud or Server deployment options.
See this video here:...Read more
On-Boarding, Training, and continued support is a must have for any tool we adopt. How does QASymphony fit into our success?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
Keeping our customers happy is a top priority, and it shows. We consistently get top satisfaction scores across the board.
Check out our customer info...Read more
What is frequency of updates/releases?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
At QASymphony, we are releasing new features and product improvements throughout the year. Right now we are targeting to release between 8 - 10 times a...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
