Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cypress and OpenText Professional Performance Engineering 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Cypress
Star Rating
(107)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansOpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Star Rating
(40)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Professional Performance EngineeringSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText LoadRunner Professional excels in stress testing capabilities, with a rating of 8.3, while Cypress does not have a specific rating for this feature, indicating that LoadRunner may be more suitable for enterprises needing robust performance testing.
- Reviewers mention that Cypress shines in ease of setup, scoring 9.4 compared to LoadRunner's 6.7, making it a more user-friendly option for teams looking to quickly implement testing solutions.
- G2 users highlight that Cypress offers superior ease of use with a score of 9.3, while LoadRunner's score of 8.3 suggests that users may face a steeper learning curve with the latter.
- Users on G2 note that LoadRunner provides extensive test variety with a score of 9.3, which is crucial for enterprises needing diverse testing scenarios, whereas Cypress may not match this breadth.
- Reviewers mention that the quality of support for Cypress is rated at 8.8, which is higher than LoadRunner's 7.6, indicating that Cypress users may have a better experience when seeking assistance.
- Users say that LoadRunner's product direction is rated at 8.5, while Cypress boasts a higher score of 9.5, suggesting that Cypress may be more aligned with future trends and user needs in the testing landscape.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cypress
OSS - Cypress Test Runner
Free
Always free and open source. No restrictions or limitations.
- http://download.cypress.io/desktop or 'npm install cypress'
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cypress
Free Trial is available
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
92
9.1
23
Ease of Use
9.2
93
8.3
24
Ease of Setup
9.3
18
6.7
9
Ease of Admin
9.3
14
7.4
9
Quality of Support
8.8
74
7.6
24
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
10
7.8
9
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
90
8.5
23
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Reporting
Not enough data
9.0
7
Functionality
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Automation
6.7
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cypress and OpenText Professional Performance Engineering are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
Cypress has no unique categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering is categorized as Load Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cypress
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
42.3%
Information Technology and Services
20.2%
Financial Services
7.7%
Program Development
3.8%
Marketing and Advertising
2.9%
Other
23.1%
Information Technology and Services
47.1%
Computer Software
14.7%
Hospital & Health Care
5.9%
Staffing and Recruiting
2.9%
Sporting Goods
2.9%
Other
26.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
Are their any resources or individuals to help us connect our app authenticating with IdentityServer
1 Comment
SR
Try cy.pause, intract with app for identity and then resume. Or use api calls.Read more
How can I influence my lead QA engineer positively to to use Cypress? Cross-browser is a factor.
1 Comment
SR
Cypress 4.0 add Firefox and edge browsers.Read more
Is there a plan to add firefox to the list of supported browsers?
1 Comment
SR
Firefox and edge are supported in cypress 4.0Read more
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
