Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cypress and OpenText Application Quality Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Visure Requirements
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Cypress
Star Rating
(107)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and results, while Cypress, although strong in other areas, does not have a dedicated test repository feature.
- Reviewers mention that Cypress shines in Ease of Use with a score of 9.3, making it particularly appealing for small businesses and teams looking for a straightforward setup, whereas OpenText ALM Quality Center has a lower score of 7.8 in this area, indicating a steeper learning curve.
- G2 users highlight that Cypress offers superior automation capabilities, particularly with its automated testing features, which are user-friendly and efficient, while OpenText ALM Quality Center's automation features are seen as more complex and less intuitive.
- Users on G2 report that OpenText ALM Quality Center provides robust reporting and analytics features, scoring 8.9, which are essential for enterprise-level projects, while Cypress, although effective, does not match this level of depth in reporting.
- Reviewers mention that the integration capabilities of OpenText ALM Quality Center, with a score of 8.1, are beneficial for larger organizations needing to connect with various tools, whereas Cypress is noted for its seamless integration with modern web applications, making it a favorite for developers.
- Users say that the product direction for Cypress is highly rated at 9.5, indicating strong ongoing development and community support, while OpenText ALM Quality Center's product direction score of 6.8 suggests some concerns about its future enhancements and adaptability.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cypress
OSS - Cypress Test Runner
Free
Always free and open source. No restrictions or limitations.
- http://download.cypress.io/desktop or 'npm install cypress'
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cypress
Free Trial is available
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
92
8.2
118
Ease of Use
9.2
93
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
9.3
18
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
9.3
14
7.2
59
Quality of Support
8.8
74
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
10
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
90
6.8
116
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
5
8.3
5
9.0
5
8.7
5
9.3
5
7.7
5
8.7
5
9.0
5
Automation
6.7
5
9.7
5
9.3
5
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cypress and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
Cypress has no unique categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cypress
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
42.3%
Information Technology and Services
20.2%
Financial Services
7.7%
Program Development
3.8%
Marketing and Advertising
2.9%
Other
23.1%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Are their any resources or individuals to help us connect our app authenticating with IdentityServer
1 Comment
SR
Try cy.pause, intract with app for identity and then resume. Or use api calls.Read more
How can I influence my lead QA engineer positively to to use Cypress? Cross-browser is a factor.
1 Comment
SR
Cypress 4.0 add Firefox and edge browsers.Read more
Is there a plan to add firefox to the list of supported browsers?
1 Comment
SR
Firefox and edge are supported in cypress 4.0Read more
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
