Compare Cyclr and Make 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (49.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (76.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial Per Month
Free
Cyclr
Star Rating
(77)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (49.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 5 pricing plansMake
Star Rating
(279)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (76.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Make excels in user satisfaction, with a higher overall score reflecting its affordability and ease of use. Users appreciate how simple API integrations are, noting that building flows can be done in minutes thanks to its intuitive interface and extensive range of supported platforms.
- Users say that Cyclr offers a robust set of integrations, making it invaluable for businesses needing to connect with third-party tools. However, some users mention that the initial learning curve can be steep, as grasping the logic of Cyclr takes time before the process becomes smoother.
- According to verified reviews, Make stands out for its quick implementation process, with users highlighting the internal tools like Webhook and Datastore that facilitate seamless connections. This contrasts with Cyclr, where users noted that while it has a vast number of connectors, the initial setup can be more complex.
- Reviewers mention that Cyclr shines in the quality of support it provides, receiving high praise for its customer service. Users feel supported throughout their integration journey, which is a significant advantage over Make, where support quality is rated lower.
- Users report that Make is particularly favorable for small businesses, with a significant majority of reviews coming from this segment. This makes it a more accessible option for smaller teams compared to Cyclr, which is more geared towards mid-market businesses and comes with a higher entry-level price.
- According to recent user feedback, both platforms offer strong real-time integration capabilities, but Make's user-friendly flow designer is frequently highlighted as a key feature that enhances daily usability. Cyclr, while effective, is noted to have a less intuitive design for creating new integrations after the initial setup.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cyclr
Native Embedded iPaaS
Free Trial
Per Month
Shared Infrastructure (US, UK or EU)
- Pay Per Connector
- 100,000 API Calls
- Unlimited Integrations
Make
Free
Free
Design, build, and automate with a visual drag-and-drop interface.
- 1,000 credits/month
- No-code workflow builder
- 3000+ apps
Free Trial
Cyclr
Free Trial is available
Make
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
68
9.1
197
Ease of Use
8.2
69
8.5
200
Ease of Setup
7.9
53
8.3
148
Ease of Admin
8.5
52
8.5
117
Quality of Support
9.7
66
8.5
165
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
50
9.2
108
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
62
8.9
184
Features by Category
Development
9.0
37
9.2
103
Feature Not Available
8.3
62
|
Verified
8.7
27
9.2
79
|
Verified
9.0
29
9.0
76
|
Verified
8.5
28
8.8
68
|
Verified
8.8
27
8.7
59
8.9
21
7.7
54
Management
7.6
30
8.4
73
|
Verified
8.3
25
8.4
72
|
Verified
8.9
29
8.3
67
|
Verified
8.4
28
8.5
70
|
Verified
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Security
8.8
26
8.3
59
|
Verified
9.2
28
8.3
63
|
Verified
9.2
25
8.4
62
|
Verified
Integration Options
8.4
20
8.5
58
|
Verified
8.8
17
8.2
58
|
Verified
8.6
19
7.4
57
|
Verified
8.6
16
7.5
48
|
Verified
Deployment
8.3
7
Feature Not Available
8.9
20
8.6
58
Data
8.8
20
Not enough data
Development
8.5
19
Not enough data
8.5
18
Not enough data
Security
8.5
20
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
Management
8.9
20
Not enough data
8.1
18
Not enough data
8.6
18
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
7.2
15
Not enough data
7.3
16
Not enough data
Application Integration
8.4
15
Not enough data
8.9
16
Not enough data
9.1
16
Not enough data
8.9
16
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cyclr and Make are categorized as iPaaS and API Marketplace
Unique Categories
Cyclr is categorized as Embedded Integration Platforms
Make has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cyclr
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Make
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
28.6%
Marketing and Advertising
15.6%
Information Technology and Services
13.0%
Retail
6.5%
Telecommunications
3.9%
Other
32.5%
Marketing and Advertising
16.3%
Computer Software
13.3%
Information Technology and Services
9.1%
Financial Services
3.8%
Retail
3.4%
Other
54.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Cyclr's position in the marketplace?
1 Comment
FD
Hi David.
Cyclr focuses on 'Embedded iPaaS' - providing a toolkit to our clients to enable them to manage their own end-user integration eco-system. In...Read more
Cyclr has no more discussions with answers
What is Make (formerly Integromat) used for?
2 Comments
SQ
Hi,
Make (formely Integromat) is used to automate work actions by means of scenarios (for example, save your incoming emails in an excel spreadsheet without...Read more
How good is Integromat?
2 Comments
AN
So far it solved all the scenarios where I needed it, where Z***** failed. Once you understand how to use the data manipulation functions you can literally...Read more
What is Integromat?
2 Comments
NB
Integromat is a powerful integration platform that allows you to visualize, design and automate your work in minutesRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.
