Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cyberhaven and Netwrix Endpoint Protector 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kitecyber
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (56.3% of reviews)
Mid-Market (54.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Cyberhaven
Star Rating
(16)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (56.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CyberhavenNetwrix Endpoint Protector
Star Rating
(159)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (54.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Netwrix Endpoint Protector excels in its real-time monitoring capabilities, scoring 9.7, which reviewers mention is crucial for immediate threat detection. In contrast, Cyberhaven also performs well but has a slightly lower score of 9.5 for activity monitoring, indicating a potential gap in real-time responsiveness.
- Reviewers mention that Cyberhaven shines in data loss prevention (DLP) configuration, achieving a score of 9.6, which users on G2 highlight as user-friendly and effective. Netwrix, while still strong at 9.1, may not offer the same level of intuitive setup for DLP features.
- G2 users note that Netwrix Endpoint Protector's incident logs feature is highly rated at 9.8, providing comprehensive tracking of data breaches. In comparison, Cyberhaven's incident logging is rated at 9.0, which some users feel lacks the depth of detail found in Netwrix's offering.
- Users say that Cyberhaven's compliance monitoring is robust, with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for enterprises focused on regulatory adherence. Netwrix, while also compliant at 9.1, may not have the same level of enterprise-focused features that Cyberhaven provides.
- Reviewers mention that Netwrix's data discovery capabilities are rated at 9.0, which users find effective for identifying sensitive data across various environments. Cyberhaven, however, scores higher at 9.8, indicating a more comprehensive approach to data visibility and management.
- Users report that Cyberhaven's cloud visibility features are superior, with a score of 9.8, which is particularly beneficial for organizations utilizing cloud services. Netwrix, while offering cloud capabilities, does not match this level of visibility, scoring lower in this critical area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cyberhaven
No pricing availableNetwrix Endpoint Protector
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cyberhaven
No trial information availableNetwrix Endpoint Protector
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
15
9.2
114
Ease of Use
8.4
16
9.1
116
Ease of Setup
8.5
16
9.0
110
Ease of Admin
8.8
14
8.9
103
Quality of Support
8.7
15
9.2
118
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
14
9.2
104
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
14
9.0
110
Features by Category
Administration
9.3
12
9.0
91
9.8
11
8.8
91
8.8
13
8.5
94
Governance
8.3
12
Feature Not Available
9.2
14
9.1
90
9.8
14
9.0
92
Security
9.0
10
Feature Not Available
8.6
12
Feature Not Available
9.5
14
Feature Not Available
9.0
13
Feature Not Available
Data Protection
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Protection
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Usability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Sensitive Data Discovery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
10
Not enough data
9.6
9
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
9.8
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Monitoring
7.0
9
Not enough data
5.0
9
Not enough data
5.6
9
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
System Control
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Vulnerability Prevention
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cyberhaven and Netwrix Endpoint Protector are categorized as Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
Unique Categories
Cyberhaven is categorized as Insider Threat Management (ITM), Sensitive Data Discovery, Data-Centric Security, and Cloud Data Security
Netwrix Endpoint Protector is categorized as Endpoint Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cyberhaven
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Financial Services
37.5%
Manufacturing
25.0%
Venture Capital & Private Equity
6.3%
Marketing and Advertising
6.3%
Legal Services
6.3%
Other
18.8%
Information Technology and Services
25.2%
Financial Services
12.2%
Computer & Network Security
10.2%
Computer Software
8.2%
Banking
4.8%
Other
39.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
Cyberhaven has no discussions with answers
can we block some domins instead of whitelisting
6 Comments
Official Response from Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Although it was not designed to block domains, Endpoint Protector can block a list of URLs defined by the Administrator. This can be done from the Blacklist...Read more
What is Endpoint DLP?
2 Comments
RB
Endpoint DLP is detecting and blocking company specific confidentiality agreements and documentations and source code from company network. Read more
What is Endpoint Protector client?
1 Comment
SN
EPP is a mature end point protector that controls the ports very granularly with ease of central management Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
