Users report that OpenText AccuRev excels in its "Branching and Merging" capabilities, allowing for more flexible version control, while CVS is often noted for its simplicity but lacks advanced branching features.
Reviewers mention that the "Quality of Support" for OpenText AccuRev is rated higher at 7.8, with users appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, whereas CVS users report a less satisfactory support experience with a rating of 7.1.
G2 users highlight that OpenText AccuRev's "Ease of Use" is rated at 7.5, with many finding the interface intuitive, while CVS users mention that the interface can feel outdated and less user-friendly, reflected in its lower rating of 7.1.
Users on G2 indicate that OpenText AccuRev has a more favorable "Product Direction" score of 5.3, suggesting that users feel confident in the product's future development, while CVS's score of 3.5 raises concerns about its ongoing evolution and support.
Reviewers say that OpenText AccuRev's "Meets Requirements" score of 8.1 reflects its ability to cater to complex enterprise needs, while CVS's score of 7.3 suggests it may not fully meet the demands of larger organizations.
Users report that OpenText AccuRev has a larger number of reviews (20) compared to CVS (13), indicating a more established user base and potentially more reliable feedback on its performance and features.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CVS
No pricing available
OpenText AccuRev
No pricing available
Free Trial
CVS
No trial information available
OpenText AccuRev
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
7.3
11
8.1
20
Ease of Use
7.1
11
7.5
20
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.1
7
7.8
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.