Users report that CVS has a lower ease of use rating (7.1) compared to Mercurial (8.8), indicating that users find Mercurial more intuitive and user-friendly for version control tasks.
Reviewers mention that Mercurial excels in ease of setup with a score of 9.1, while CVS lacks this feature, making Mercurial a more attractive option for teams looking to get started quickly.
G2 users highlight that CVS has a lower quality of support rating (7.1) compared to Mercurial (7.6), suggesting that users may experience better assistance and resources when using Mercurial.
Users on G2 report that CVS has a significantly lower product direction score (3.5) compared to Mercurial (6.8), indicating that users feel more confident in Mercurial's future development and feature enhancements.
Reviewers say that while CVS is primarily used in enterprise environments, Mercurial is favored by small businesses (54.8% of reviews), suggesting that Mercurial may be more adaptable to the needs of smaller teams.
Users mention that Mercurial's overall star rating (4.2) is notably higher than CVS's (3.5), reflecting a more favorable reception and satisfaction among its user base.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CVS
No pricing available
Mercurial
No pricing available
Free Trial
CVS
No trial information available
Mercurial
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
7.3
11
8.6
30
Ease of Use
7.1
11
8.8
30
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.1
9
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.3
9
Quality of Support
7.1
7
7.6
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.