Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cursor and GitHub Copilot 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Anima
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Zencoder.ai
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (39.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Cursor
Star Rating
(18)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CursorGitHub Copilot
Star Rating
(183)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GitHub CopilotSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub Copilot excels in accuracy, scoring 8.5, with reviewers mentioning its ability to generate contextually relevant code snippets, making it a reliable partner for developers. In contrast, Cursor's accuracy score of 7.4 indicates that users sometimes find its suggestions less precise.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub Copilot has a superior ease of use rating of 9.0, with many users appreciating its intuitive interface and seamless integration with popular IDEs. Cursor, while still user-friendly, has a slightly lower score of 8.8, with some users noting a steeper learning curve.
- G2 users highlight GitHub Copilot's strong community support, scoring 8.4, where users frequently share tips and best practices. In comparison, Cursor's community score of 7.1 suggests a smaller user base, which may limit collaborative learning opportunities.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub Copilot's documentation is comprehensive, earning an 8.8 score, which helps new users get up to speed quickly. Cursor's documentation, with a score of 8.3, is considered adequate but lacks some depth in certain areas, according to reviewers.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub Copilot's product direction is highly rated at 9.9, indicating a strong commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates. In contrast, Cursor's score of 8.7 suggests that while it is progressing, users desire more frequent enhancements.
- Users say that GitHub Copilot's ease of setup is impressive, scoring 9.2, with many finding the installation process straightforward. Cursor, with a score of 9.0, is also easy to set up, but some users report minor configuration challenges that could be streamlined.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cursor
No pricing availableGitHub Copilot
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cursor
No trial information availableGitHub Copilot
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
16
8.8
175
Ease of Use
9.0
18
9.0
176
Ease of Setup
8.9
18
9.2
69
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.9
29
Quality of Support
8.3
7
8.6
159
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.3
30
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
16
9.9
174
Features by Category
Functionality
7.6
12
8.5
138
7.6
12
8.6
137
8.1
12
8.6
137
7.5
12
8.7
135
Support
7.4
11
8.4
131
8.2
12
8.5
130
8.1
12
8.8
133
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
8.5
9
8.1
14
6.9
8
8.0
14
8.0
9
8.3
14
8.1
8
8.1
14
7.1
8
8.0
14
Functionality - AI Coding Assistants
8.6
6
7.7
28
7.2
6
7.9
27
5.3
6
7.4
25
Usability - AI Coding Assistants
8.6
6
7.9
25
9.3
5
8.8
26
8.3
6
8.0
27
9.4
6
8.2
24
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cursor and GitHub Copilot are categorized as AI Code Generation and AI Coding Assistants
Unique Categories
Cursor has no unique categories
GitHub Copilot is categorized as AI AppSec Assistants
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cursor
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitHub Copilot
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
50.0%
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Consulting
5.6%
Research
5.6%
Pharmaceuticals
5.6%
Other
16.7%
Computer Software
42.0%
Information Technology and Services
19.3%
Financial Services
4.5%
Computer & Network Security
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.3%
Other
28.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
Cursor has no discussions with answers
GitHub Copilot has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
