Users report that Microsoft Entra Permissions Management excels in "Policy Management" with a score of 9.5, indicating strong capabilities in managing access policies effectively, while CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, although robust, scores slightly lower in this area, suggesting it may not be as intuitive for policy management.
Reviewers mention that CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security shines in "Anomaly Detection" with a high score of 9.5, which is crucial for identifying unusual patterns that could indicate security threats, whereas Microsoft Entra Permissions Management scores 8.5, indicating it may not be as effective in this critical area.
G2 users highlight that Microsoft Entra Permissions Management offers superior "Unified Policy Management" with a score of 9.2, making it easier for organizations to manage multiple policies across different environments, while CrowdStrike's approach may require more manual oversight.
Users on G2 report that CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security provides excellent "Threat Hunting" capabilities, scoring 8.9, which is essential for proactive security measures, while Microsoft Entra Permissions Management does not emphasize this feature as strongly.
Reviewers say that Microsoft Entra Permissions Management has a more user-friendly "Administration Console" with a score of 8.9, making it easier for administrators to navigate and manage settings, compared to CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, which scores 8.8 but may have a steeper learning curve.
Users report that CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security's "Compliance Monitoring" feature, scoring 8.3, is effective for maintaining regulatory compliance, but Microsoft Entra Permissions Management's score of 8.6 indicates a slightly better performance in ensuring compliance across various standards.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.