Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Coverity and SonarQube 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Coverity
Star Rating
(55)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CoveritySonarQube
Star Rating
(125)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that SonarQube Server excels in Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.0, highlighting its ability to provide comprehensive insights into code quality. In contrast, Coverity also performs well with a score of 9.2, but some users mention that it can be more complex to set up initially.
- Reviewers mention that Coverity shines in Extensibility with a score of 9.0, allowing for a wide range of integrations and customizations. On the other hand, SonarQube Server's extensibility is rated lower at 6.3, which some users find limiting when trying to adapt the tool to their specific workflows.
- G2 users highlight that Coverity offers superior Compliance Testing capabilities with a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for organizations focused on regulatory requirements. In comparison, SonarQube Server's compliance testing is rated lower at 7.1, which some users feel may not meet all their compliance needs.
- Users on G2 report that SonarQube Server provides better Documentation feedback with a score of 7.7, but Coverity outperforms in prioritization and remediation suggestions, both scoring 9.3. Reviewers mention that the clarity and depth of Coverity's documentation significantly enhance the user experience.
- Reviewers say that while SonarQube Server has a solid Quality of Support rating of 8.0, Coverity surpasses it with a score of 8.6, indicating that users find Coverity's support team more responsive and helpful in resolving issues.
- Users report that SonarQube Server's Ease of Use is rated at 8.3, which is favorable, but Coverity slightly edges it out with a score of 8.4. Some users mention that Coverity's interface is more intuitive, making it easier for new users to navigate and utilize effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Coverity
No pricing availableSonarQube
Community Edition
Free
Explore: https://www.sonarsource.com/plans-and-pricing/
- Free
- Popular & classic languages support
- Integration with DevOps platforms
Free Trial
Coverity
No trial information availableSonarQube
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
43
8.8
108
Ease of Use
8.4
43
8.5
111
Ease of Setup
8.2
19
8.1
70
Ease of Admin
8.2
19
8.5
63
Quality of Support
8.6
37
8.2
91
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
18
8.4
57
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
40
8.6
105
Features by Category
Administration
8.3
11
7.8
19
9.0
12
6.0
20
Analysis
8.9
11
7.4
21
8.8
11
8.0
20
9.2
11
8.9
22
8.9
11
9.0
22
Testing
8.5
11
6.6
18
8.5
8
5.9
19
8.5
10
6.0
21
9.1
11
6.9
18
8.8
10
6.8
17
8.9
11
8.2
21
7.6
12
6.9
21
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.2
29
Management
Not enough data
7.7
27
Not enough data
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.8
27
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
9.3
5
7.7
35
9.3
5
7.6
35
8.7
5
8.2
36
Security
7.0
5
6.9
33
8.3
5
7.0
32
8.3
5
7.9
33
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Management & Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Access Control and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
6.7
8
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Coverity and SonarQube are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Static Code Analysis, and Secure Code Review
Unique Categories
Coverity has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Coverity
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SonarQube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
36.4%
Information Technology and Services
12.7%
Telecommunications
9.1%
Computer & Network Security
7.3%
Semiconductors
5.5%
Other
29.1%
Information Technology and Services
26.6%
Computer Software
21.8%
Financial Services
6.5%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Computer & Network Security
3.2%
Other
38.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Coverity has no discussions with answers
SonarQube has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
