Join the 1500 companies using G2 Track to manage SaaS spend, usage, contracts & compliance.
Compare CoSchedule, MindManager, and Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management

Pricing

 
Individual
$40
user/month (paid annually)
MindManager for Mac
$179
Project Online Professional
$30
/User/Month
 
Growth
$80
user/month (paid annually)
MindManager for Windows
$349
Project Online Essentials
$7
/User/Month
 
Professional
$400
user/month (paid annually)
Project Professional (Project Managers)
$1,159.99
 
Enterprise
$1400
user/month (paid annually)
Project Standard (Project Managers)
$589.99
 
Project Online Premium
$55
/User/Month
 
Free Trial
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
CoSchedule
Individual
$40user/month (paid annually)
Growth
$80user/month (paid annually)
Professional
$400user/month (paid annually)
Enterprise
$1400user/month (paid annually)
Free Trial
MindManager
MindManager for Mac
$179
MindManager for Windows
$349
Free Trial Unavailable
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Project Online Professional
$30/User/Month
Project Online Essentials
$7/User/Month
Project Professional (Project Managers)
$1,159.99
Project Standard (Project Managers)
$589.99
Project Online Premium
$55/User/Month
Free Trial Unavailable

Ratings

Meets Requirements
Meets Requirements
8.4
8.5
8.3
Ease of Use
Ease of Use
8.6
9.0
7.2
Ease of Setup
Ease of Setup
8.5
8.8
7.5
Ease of Admin
Ease of Admin
8.6
8.5
7.6
Quality of Support
Quality of Support
8.8
8.3
7.5
Ease of Doing Business With
Ease of Doing Business With
9.2
8.6
7.9
Product Direction (% positive)
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
9.2
6.5
Meets Requirements
CoSchedule
8.4
MindManager
8.5
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.3
Ease of Use
CoSchedule
8.6
MindManager
9.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.2
Ease of Setup
CoSchedule
8.5
MindManager
8.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Ease of Admin
CoSchedule
8.6
MindManager
8.5
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Quality of Support
CoSchedule
8.8
MindManager
8.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Ease of Doing Business With
CoSchedule
9.2
MindManager
8.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Product Direction (% positive)
CoSchedule
8.6
MindManager
9.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
6.5

Features

Tasks
Task Creation and Assignment
CoSchedule
8.5
MindManager
9.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.4
Due Dates
CoSchedule
8.5
MindManager
8.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.5
Task Prioritization
CoSchedule
8.3
MindManager
8.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.2
To-Do Lists
CoSchedule
8.7
MindManager
8.6
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1
Collaboration
Collaborative Project Planning
CoSchedule
8.7
MindManager
7.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.7
Comments
CoSchedule
8.2
MindManager
7.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Documents and Uploads
CoSchedule
7.4
MindManager
8.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Projects
Gantt Chart / Project Map
CoSchedule
8.0
MindManager
8.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.6
Calendar View
CoSchedule
9.2
MindManager
8.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.3
Baselining / KPIs
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
7.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Project Budgeting
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
6.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Issue Tracking
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
8.2
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Coordination
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
8.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Portfolio Budgeting
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
What-If Scenarios
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
9.5
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Workflow
CoSchedule
8.3
MindManager
9.8
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Request Management
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
8.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Cost Tracking
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
ROI and Forecasting
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
Not enough data available
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.6
Risk Analysis
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
7.0
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.5
Resource Management
Resource Database
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
6.9
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Resource Allocation
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
6.9
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Workload Capacity
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
6.4
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
Time Tracking
CoSchedule
Not enough data available
MindManager
6.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1
Platform
Alerts
CoSchedule
8.5
MindManager
6.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.7
Mobile
CoSchedule
6.7
MindManager
6.5
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.0
User, Role, and Access Management
CoSchedule
8.5
MindManager
6.7
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.9
API / Integrations
CoSchedule
7.6
MindManager
6.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Reporting and Dashboards
CoSchedule
7.3
MindManager
8.1
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.8
Customization
CoSchedule
7.9
MindManager
7.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
7.4
Performance and Reliability
CoSchedule
9.1
MindManager
8.3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
8.1

Reviewers' Company Size

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
66.7%
44.8%
24.7%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
30.0%
20.7%
27.2%
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
3.3%
34.5%
48.1%
CoSchedule
Small-Business
66.7%
Mid-Market
30.0%
Enterprise
3.3%
MindManager
Small-Business
44.8%
Mid-Market
20.7%
Enterprise
34.5%
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Small-Business
24.7%
Mid-Market
27.2%
Enterprise
48.1%

Reviewers' Industry

 
Marketing and Advertising
20.6%
Information Technology and Services
13.9%
Information Technology and Services
14.6%
 
Internet
11.5%
Computer Software
11.1%
Hospital & Health Care
5.3%
 
Computer Software
9.2%
Staffing and Recruiting
5.6%
Higher Education
5.0%
 
Non-Profit Organization Management
5.3%
Real Estate
5.6%
Construction
4.7%
 
Information Technology and Services
5.3%
Medical Devices
5.6%
Computer Software
4.4%
 
Other
48.1%
Other
58.3%
Other
66.0%
CoSchedule
Marketing and Advertising
20.6%
Internet
11.5%
Computer Software
9.2%
Non-Profit Organization Management
5.3%
Information Technology and Services
5.3%
Other
48.1%
MindManager
Information Technology and Services
13.9%
Computer Software
11.1%
Staffing and Recruiting
5.6%
Real Estate
5.6%
Medical Devices
5.6%
Other
58.3%
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Information Technology and Services
14.6%
Hospital & Health Care
5.3%
Higher Education
5.0%
Construction
4.7%
Computer Software
4.4%
Other
66.0%

Reviews

Most Helpful Favorable Review
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Rob Z.
User in Internet

Browser extension and social media scheduling tool are easy to use and make scheduling content a breeze. Calendar view is really helpful for coordinating content initiatives across the team. Interface is pretty intuitive, but could improve. Google doc...

David I.
User in Architecture & Planning

The way mind maps are structured is perfect for the way I think and organize my throughts.

John O.
User in Computer Software

Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 User in Photography

The cost versus what we got for it. Bit clunky to use.

Cameron E.
Internal Consultant in Insurance

It is still clunky and not able to be tweaked to my teams needs. It's a good tool, but to much work is needed to make it the go to tool. Also we need a little more customization to build in the frame work of a project. Agile vs. Interative (Waterfall I...

Brittany T.
User in Computer Software

It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.

 
CoSchedule
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Rob Z.
User in Internet

Browser extension and social media scheduling tool are easy to use and make scheduling content a breeze. Calendar view is really helpful for coordinating content initiatives across the team. Interface is pretty intuitive, but could improve. Google doc...

Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 User in Photography

The cost versus what we got for it. Bit clunky to use.

MindManager
Most Helpful Favorable Review
David I.
User in Architecture & Planning

The way mind maps are structured is perfect for the way I think and organize my throughts.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Cameron E.
Internal Consultant in Insurance

It is still clunky and not able to be tweaked to my teams needs. It's a good tool, but to much work is needed to make it the go to tool. Also we need a little more customization to build in the frame work of a project. Agile vs. Interative (Waterfall I...

Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Most Helpful Favorable Review
John O.
User in Computer Software

Microsoft Project has been a standard for tracking projects of various sizes. The dependency chaining works quite well and helps visualize resource and task scheduling. Good for milestone tracking at a high level, while also designating resources to...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Brittany T.
User in Computer Software

It is buggy and difficult to use at times. It does not lend its self to ease of use.

Screenshots

 
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
1 of 3
2 of 3
3 of 3
1 of 3
2 of 3
3 of 3
Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management
Request More InformationRequest More InformationAsk MindManager a QuestionContact MindManagerRequest More InformationRequest More Information