Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Core Impact and Veracode Application Security Platform 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (37.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$9,450.00 1 User Per Year
No pricing available
Core Impact
Star Rating
(25)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (37.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
$9,450.00 1 User Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansVeracode Application Security Platform
Star Rating
(25)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Veracode Application Security PlatformSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that the "Ease of Setup" for Veracode Application Security Platform is notably lower at 5.7 compared to Core Impact's 7.7, indicating that Veracode may require more time and effort to implement effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Core Impact excels in "Quality of Support" with a score of 9.0, while Veracode's support is rated at 8.0, suggesting that users may find more responsive and helpful assistance with Core Impact.
- G2 users highlight the "Extensibility" of Core Impact, scoring 9.2, which allows for better customization and integration with existing systems compared to Veracode's score of 8.6, making Core Impact a more flexible choice for diverse environments.
- Users on G2 note that Veracode's "Static Code Analysis" feature shines with a score of 9.3, indicating a strong capability in identifying vulnerabilities in code, while Core Impact's score of 8.6 suggests it may not be as robust in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Core Impact's "Test Automation" feature is highly rated at 9.5, which can significantly enhance testing efficiency, whereas Veracode's capabilities in this area are not as strong, reflecting a potential gap in automated testing functionalities.
- Users say that the "Detection Rate" for Core Impact is rated at 8.0, which is lower than Veracode's 9.0, indicating that Veracode may have a more effective mechanism for identifying security vulnerabilities, a critical factor for application security.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Core Impact
Core Impact Basic
$9,450.00
1 User Per Year
Core Impact Basic includes limited features for network testing and enables security professionals to get their pen testing program moving.
- Network Testing
- Reporting
- Remediation Validation
Veracode Application Security Platform
No pricing availableFree Trial
Core Impact
Free Trial is available
Veracode Application Security Platform
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
14
8.1
19
Ease of Use
8.2
14
7.3
19
Ease of Setup
7.7
13
5.7
7
Ease of Admin
8.7
13
7.4
7
Quality of Support
9.0
14
8.0
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
13
7.9
7
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
12
6.3
19
Features by Category
Administration
7.0
5
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
Analysis
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
Testing
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.3
9
Not enough data
9.5
7
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.8
6
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Core Impact and Veracode Application Security Platform are categorized as Penetration Testing
Unique Categories
Core Impact has no unique categories
Veracode Application Security Platform is categorized as AI AppSec Assistants, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Vulnerability Scanner, Static Code Analysis, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Secure Code Review, Software Composition Analysis, and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Core Impact
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Veracode Application Security Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
20.8%
Telecommunications
16.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
8.3%
Hospital & Health Care
8.3%
Other
20.8%
Information Technology and Services
30.4%
Hospital & Health Care
13.0%
Consumer Goods
8.7%
Computer Software
8.7%
Telecommunications
4.3%
Other
34.8%
Discussions
What is Core Impact software?
1 Comment
KK
Penetration testing software.Read more
Core Impact has no more discussions with answers
Veracode Application Security Platform has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
