Link copied to clipboard

# Core Impact vs Metasploit Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/core-impact/metasploit/export.csv)

Core ImpactMetasploit[+ Add Product](#)

Reviews

**Core Impact** [

4.1/5(30)

](https://www.g2.com/products/core-impact/reviews#reviews)

**Metasploit** [

4.6/5(55)

](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews#reviews)

Pricing

**Core Impact**
Free Trial

**$9,450.00** 1 User Per Year · Core Impact Basic

**Metasploit**
Free Trial

No pricing available

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Time to Implement

**Core Impact**
2 months

Based on 6 responses

**Metasploit**
Not enough reviews yet

Return on Investment

**Core Impact**
Not enough reviews yet

**Metasploit**
Not enough reviews yet

Perceived Cost

**Core Impact**
$$$$$

**Metasploit**
$$$$$

Average Discount

**Core Impact**
Not enough reviews yet

**Metasploit**
Not enough reviews yet

Pros & Cons

**Core Impact**
Not enough data

**Metasploit**
[
Pentesting Efficiency (2)
](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1978658&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Expertise (1)
](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1978657&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Complex Setup (1)
](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1978656&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)

Screenshots

**Core Impact**
 ![Core Impact screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/139745/core-impact-network-attack-thumbnail.png)

**Metasploit**
No screenshot available

Ratings

Meets Requirements

**Core Impact**

8.1

8.119

**Metasploit**

8.9

8.942

Ease of Use

**Core Impact**

8.0

8.019

**Metasploit**

8.1

8.142

Ease of Setup

**Core Impact**

7.4

7.418

**Metasploit**

7.8

7.822

Ease of Admin

**Core Impact**

8.3

8.317

**Metasploit**

8.3

8.320

Quality of Support

**Core Impact**

8.7

8.718

**Metasploit**

8.2

8.236

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Core Impact**

8.9

8.916

**Metasploit**

8.7

8.717

Product Direction (% positive)

**Core Impact**

7.1

7.116

**Metasploit**

9.1

9.138

Features

Penetration Testing[Hide 39 FeaturesShow 39 Features](javascript:void(0);)

8.6

15

8.4

23

Administration

API

7.5

6

8.5(won by 1.0)

9

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Extensibility

8.6(won by 0.5)

6

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

8.1

13

Reporting and Analytics

7.5

10

7.7(won by 0.2)

14

Analysis

Issue Tracking

7.7

8

8.1(won by 0.4)

12

Reconnaissance

8.8(won by 0.2)

10

8.6

17

Vulnerability Scan

9.1(won by 0.4)

9

8.7

19

Compliance Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Automatic Scans

Not enough data

Not enough data

SPA Scans

Not enough data

Not enough data

Testing

Command-Line Tools

9.2(won by 0.1)

6

9.1

20

Manual Testing

9.3(won by 1.0)

10

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

8.3

21

Test Automation

9.6(won by 1.6)

8

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

8.0

16

Performance and Reliability

9.1(won by 0.7)

11

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

8.4

19

Additional Functionality

Network Mapping

Not enough data

Not enough data

Activity Dashboard

Not enough data

Not enough data

SQL Injections

Not enough data

Not enough data

Audit Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Threat Intelligence

Not enough data

Not enough data

Assignment Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Integration Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

User Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Asset Discovery

Not enough data

Not enough data

Remediation Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Scanning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Generative AI

Not enough data

Not enough data

Multi-User Collaboration

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI Copilot

Not enough data

Not enough data

Web-Application Security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Assessment

Not enough data

Not enough data

Security Auditing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Runtime Container Security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Network Scanning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Password Cracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Simulated Threat Attacks

Not enough data

Not enough data

Certificates

Not enough data

Not enough data

Alerts/Notifications

Not enough data

Not enough data

Real-Time Data

Not enough data

Not enough data

Cross-Site Scripting

Not enough data

Not enough data

Exploit Frameworks

Not enough data

Not enough data

Show 1 feature category with incomplete data

Red Teaming Tools[Hide 10 FeaturesShow 10 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

Not enough data

Adversary Emulation & Operations - Red Teaming Tools

Command & Control Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Lateral Movement Simulation

Not enough data

Not enough data

Post-Exploitation Workflows

Not enough data

Not enough data

Multi-Stage Attack Campaigns

Not enough data

Not enough data

MITRE ATT&CK & Reporting - Red Teaming Tools

Detection Gap Analysis

Not enough data

Not enough data

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

Not enough data

Not enough data

Adversary Campaign Reporting

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI-Powered Red Teaming - Red Teaming Tools

AI-Assisted Remediation Recommendations

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI-Generated Attack Paths

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI-Powered Detection Coverage Analysis

Not enough data

Not enough data

User Insights

Reviewers' Company Size

[![Core Impact](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/3035052d6bfeb5a52ef3d5aa9204586d/core-impact.svg "Core Impact")](https://www.g2.com/products/core-impact/reviews)

Core Impact

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

37.9%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

31.0%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

31.0%

[![Metasploit](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_bbb8392f9e5dedc53d202a2327302a06/metasploit.jpg "Metasploit")](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews)

Metasploit

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

47.2%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

39.6%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

13.2%

Small-Business

(50 or fewer emp.)

37.9%

47.2%

Mid-Market

(51-1000 emp.)

31.0%

39.6%

Enterprise

(\> 1000 emp.)

31.0%

13.2%

Reviewers' Industry

[![Core Impact](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/3035052d6bfeb5a52ef3d5aa9204586d/core-impact.svg "Core Impact")](https://www.g2.com/products/core-impact/reviews)
Core Impact

Computer & Network Security

24.1%

Information Technology and Services

17.2%

Telecommunications

13.8%

Computer Software

10.3%

Transportation/Trucking/Railroad

6.9%

Other

27.6%

[![Metasploit](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_bbb8392f9e5dedc53d202a2327302a06/metasploit.jpg "Metasploit")](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews)
Metasploit

Computer & Network Security

34.0%

Information Technology and Services

22.6%

Computer Software

7.5%

Security and Investigations

3.8%

Computer Networking

3.8%

Other

28.3%

FAQs

## Core Impact vs Metasploit FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 14, 2026

### What is the difference between Metasploit vs Core Impact?

Metasploit stands out for its higher G2 rating and reviewer-cited pentesting efficiency, while Core Impact is noted for its comprehensive reporting and support quality.

| [Metasploit](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews) | [Core Impact](https://www.g2.com/products/core-impact/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.6/5 (55 reviews) | 4.1/5 (30 reviews) |
| Small-Business | Small-Business |
| 7.8 | 7.4 |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Pentesting Efficiency (2 all-time mentions) | Comprehensive reporting and automation |

### How do the pricing models of Metasploit and Core Impact compare?

Metasploit is rated higher for value, with reviewers expressing greater satisfaction with its cost compared to Core Impact.

- **Metasploit:** Reviewers consistently highlight its value as a free or lower-cost toolkit with extensive features for penetration testing.
- **Core Impact:** Recent reviews cite high licensing costs as a major drawback, with several reviewers noting the price is difficult to justify for smaller teams.
- **Switching reasons:** Reviewers mention switching to Metasploit Pro or other tools due to Core Impact's high cost and limited web application testing capabilities.

### What are the best alternatives to Metasploit and Core Impact?

The best alternatives to Metasploit and Core Impact are Burp Suite, Acunetix by Invicti, and Qualys.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Metasploit](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews) | 4.6/5 (55 reviews) | Small-Business | Reviewers highlight strong value and free access | Pentesting Efficiency |
| [Core Impact](https://www.g2.com/products/core-impact/reviews) | 4.1/5 (30 reviews) | Small-Business | Reviewers cite high licensing costs | Comprehensive reporting and automation |
| [Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/reviews) | 4.8/5 (129 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | Web application security testing |
| [Acunetix by Invicti](https://www.g2.com/products/acunetix-by-invicti/reviews) | 4.1/5 (105 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Automated vulnerability scanning |

### Which Penetration Testing features should I prioritize when comparing Metasploit and Core Impact?

Buyers should prioritize exploit library breadth, automation, reporting, ease of setup, and integration capabilities when comparing Metasploit and Core Impact.

- **Exploit library breadth:** Metasploit is frequently praised for its extensive and regularly updated exploit database; Core Impact is noted for multi-vector coverage and integration of Metasploit modules.
- **Automation:** Core Impact is highlighted for automation and rapid penetration test wizards; Metasploit reviewers mention a desire for more automation features.
- **Reporting:** Core Impact receives positive feedback for customizable and professional reporting, especially for compliance (PCI, CMCC).
- **Ease of setup:** Metasploit scores 7.8, Core Impact 7.4 on Ease of Setup, with reviewers noting complexity as a trade-off for both.
- **Integration capabilities:** Core Impact integrates with major vulnerability scanners and Metasploit modules; Metasploit is noted for integration with vulnerability scanners, network analyzers, and IDS/IPS systems.

### What are the pros and cons of Metasploit vs Core Impact?

Metasploit's headline strength is pentesting efficiency, while Core Impact excels in comprehensive reporting and automation.

- **Metasploit strengths:** Pentesting efficiency (2 all-time mentions), extensive exploit and payload library, open-source flexibility, and strong value for cost.
- **Metasploit trade-offs:** Complex setup (1 all-time mention), steep learning curve for beginners, and occasional issues with exploit database updates.
- **Core Impact strengths:** Comprehensive reporting, automation features, multi-vector coverage, and integration with Metasploit modules.
- **Core Impact trade-offs:** High licensing cost, dated interface, steeper learning curve, and less effective web application testing compared to competitors.

### Is Metasploit or Core Impact better for small businesses?

Metasploit is the better fit for small businesses, supported by its largest segment and positive small-business reviewer sentiment.

- **Metasploit:** Largest segment is Small-Business; reviewers highlight its accessibility, value, and suitability for teams with limited budgets.
- **Core Impact:** Largest segment is Small-Business; reviewers note high cost as a barrier for smaller teams and cite value concerns.

### Which Penetration Testing platform has better integrations?

Metasploit and Core Impact are at parity for integrations, with both products supporting integration with vulnerability scanners and related tools.

- **Metasploit:** Reviewers mention integration with vulnerability scanners, network analyzers, and IDS/IPS systems.
- **Core Impact:** Reviewers cite integration with major vulnerability scanners and Metasploit modules.

### How do Metasploit and Core Impact compare on customer support?

Core Impact scores higher on Quality of Support, with a 0.5-point advantage over Metasploit.

- **Metasploit:** Reviewers describe support as generally positive but occasionally slow or limited in depth.
- **Core Impact:** Reviewers consistently praise responsive and helpful support, with several citing strong onboarding and issue resolution experiences.

### Which is easier to implement, Metasploit or Core Impact?

Metasploit and Core Impact are at near-parity on Ease of Setup, with Metasploit scoring 7.8 and Core Impact 7.4.

- **Metasploit:** Reviewers note that setup can be complex for beginners but is manageable with documentation and community resources.
- **Core Impact:** Reviewers mention a learning curve and some installation challenges, but also highlight onboarding documentation and support as helpful for implementation.

### Which product has better API?

Metasploit is more frequently cited for its API capabilities, which is the most mentioned feature across both products.

- **Metasploit:** Reviewers highlight a handy API, with positive sentiment in recent and older reviews.
- **Core Impact:** API capabilities are not specifically mentioned in recent reviews.

Alternatives

**Core Impact Alternatives**

 ![Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/8b9bbc1b8758727122569ca626a30959/invicti-web-api-formerly-acunetix.svg "Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)")

[
Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)
](/products/invicti-web-api-formerly-acunetix/reviews)

 ![Intruder](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1539808658/intruder.svg "Intruder")

[
Intruder
](/products/intruder/reviews)

 ![Astra Pentest](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/f04194bbb96125a9c3dd43547c09aac3/astra-pentest.svg "Astra Pentest")

[
Astra Pentest
](/products/astra-pentest/reviews)

 ![Aikido Security](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/281b7973f3fd54aeeba3bec666fa4da6/aikido-security.svg "Aikido Security")

[
Aikido Security
](/products/aikido-security/reviews)

**Metasploit Alternatives**

 ![Burp Suite](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1084a0792dcd7344d19c56aea015669c/burp-suite.svg "Burp Suite")

[
Burp Suite
](/products/burp-suite/reviews)

 ![Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/8b9bbc1b8758727122569ca626a30959/invicti-web-api-formerly-acunetix.svg "Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)")

[
Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)
](/products/invicti-web-api-formerly-acunetix/reviews)

 ![Invicti](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/3bee4d2b732dab5368b9a8aa21f05e30/invicti.svg "Invicti")

[
Invicti
](/products/invicti/reviews)

 ![SQLmap](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_0c7a42988b3f8636634ea5dcddfb64f2/sqlmap.jpg "SQLmap")

[
SQLmap
](/products/sqlmap/reviews)

## Core Impact vs Metasploit

When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Metasploit easier to use and set up. However, reviewers felt that administration of both products was equally easy, and preferred doing business with Core Impact overall.

- Reviewers felt that Metasploit meets the needs of their business better than Core Impact.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Core Impact is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Metasploit over Core Impact.