Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Copado Essentials and GitHub 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (36.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 1 User Per Month
$0.00 1 users
Copado Essentials
Star Rating
(41)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (36.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 1 User Per Month
Browse all 3 pricing plansGitHub
Star Rating
(2,268)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.1, which allows seamless connectivity with various tools and services, while Copado Essentials also matches this score but is noted for its Extensibility at 9.7, making it a better choice for users needing customizable solutions.
- Reviewers mention that Copado Essentials shines in Test Customization with a score of 9.7, providing users with advanced options for tailoring tests, whereas GitHub's score of 8.6 indicates it may not offer the same level of flexibility in this area.
- G2 users highlight that GitHub's Deployment-Ready Staging feature, rated at 9.0, is highly effective for preparing code for production, while Copado Essentials leads with a score of 9.5, indicating a more robust staging environment that users find beneficial for their deployment processes.
- Users on G2 report that Copado Essentials has a superior Automation feature, scoring 9.4, which enhances workflow efficiency, compared to GitHub's score of 8.9, suggesting that Copado may provide more comprehensive automation tools.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Quality of Support is rated at 8.7, which is generally favorable, but Copado Essentials is slightly lower at 8.6, indicating that users may find GitHub's support more responsive or helpful based on their experiences.
- Users say that GitHub's Ease of Use is rated at 8.7, making it user-friendly for beginners, while Copado Essentials scores higher at 9.5, suggesting that it may offer a more intuitive interface for users who prioritize ease of navigation.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Copado Essentials
Free
Free
1 User Per Month
For the Admin deploying infrequent releases
- Up to 15 deploys/mo
- Connect any Org
- Standard and Custom Metadata
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Free Trial
Copado Essentials
Free Trial is available
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
34
9.3
1,964
Ease of Use
9.3
34
8.7
1,980
Ease of Setup
9.1
32
9.0
591
Ease of Admin
9.2
20
8.7
451
Quality of Support
8.2
29
8.8
1,571
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
18
8.9
387
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
31
8.9
1,916
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Administration
Not enough data
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Analysis
Not enough data
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Testing
Not enough data
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
10.0
14
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
98
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
97
Not enough data
8.9
91
IT Management
Not enough data
9.0
100
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Functionality
8.6
23
9.1
238
8.4
25
9.2
241
8.2
19
8.9
238
Management
8.5
25
9.0
236
7.9
21
8.5
231
8.2
22
9.0
239
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
7.0
11
9.4
29
7.3
11
9.2
29
7.4
12
9.0
29
6.7
11
9.2
30
7.5
12
9.2
29
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
79
Not enough data
9.2
78
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
76
Management
Not enough data
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
138
Not enough data
8.6
133
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Processes
Not enough data
8.9
137
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
139
Functionality
8.6
14
9.3
223
8.7
13
9.0
212
8.7
13
8.7
204
Management
8.6
14
8.9
217
8.5
13
8.9
213
7.8
12
8.3
208
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
7.5
6
8.9
33
8.1
6
9.0
33
6.9
6
8.9
33
6.7
6
8.5
33
6.7
6
8.8
33
Documentation
Not enough data
8.8
185
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Security
Not enough data
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Copado Essentials and GitHub are categorized as Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery
Unique Categories
Copado Essentials has no unique categories
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Copado Essentials
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
31.6%
Telecommunications
7.9%
Computer Software
7.9%
Automotive
7.9%
Management Consulting
5.3%
Other
39.5%
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Copado Essentials has no discussions with answers
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
