Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Contrast Security and Veracode Application Security Platform 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Contrast Security
Star Rating
(51)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Contrast SecurityVeracode Application Security Platform
Star Rating
(25)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Veracode Application Security PlatformSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that the "Ease of Setup" for Veracode Application Security Platform is rated at 5.7, which indicates a more challenging onboarding process compared to Contrast Security's score of 7.8, suggesting that users may find Contrast easier to implement.
- Reviewers mention that the "Quality of Support" for Contrast Security is notably higher at 9.3, while Veracode's score of 8.0 indicates that users may experience less satisfaction with support services, impacting their overall experience.
- G2 users highlight that Veracode excels in "Static Code Analysis" with a score of 9.3, which reviewers say provides thorough insights into code vulnerabilities, whereas Contrast Security's score of 8.5 suggests it may not be as robust in this area.
- Users on G2 report that Contrast Security shines in "Ease of Use" with a score of 8.6, making it more user-friendly compared to Veracode's score of 7.3, which may lead to a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers mention that the "Detection Rate" for both products is competitive, with Veracode scoring 8.5 and Contrast at 8.2, indicating that both platforms are effective in identifying vulnerabilities, but Veracode may have a slight edge.
- Users say that the "Remediation Suggestions" feature in Veracode, rated at 8.3, is particularly helpful, while Contrast Security's score of 8.1 suggests it may offer slightly less guidance, which could affect the speed of addressing vulnerabilities.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Contrast Security
No pricing availableVeracode Application Security Platform
No pricing availableFree Trial
Contrast Security
Free Trial is available
Veracode Application Security Platform
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
42
8.1
19
Ease of Use
8.6
43
7.3
19
Ease of Setup
7.8
29
5.7
7
Ease of Admin
8.9
28
7.4
7
Quality of Support
9.3
41
8.0
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
28
7.9
7
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
40
6.3
19
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.5
7
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
Analysis
9.0
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
Testing
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.8
15
7.9
7
8.6
14
9.2
6
Analysis
9.0
16
8.3
7
8.2
16
8.3
5
8.6
13
9.3
7
8.9
16
8.8
7
8.7
15
8.6
6
Testing
8.1
13
Not enough data
8.5
11
9.0
5
8.2
14
Not enough data
8.2
13
8.3
5
8.3
16
8.0
5
7.2
16
7.8
6
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.1
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.3
16
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
8.9
16
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) ToolsHide 4 FeaturesShow 4 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Threat Detection & Response - Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Contrast Security and Veracode Application Security Platform are categorized as Software Composition Analysis, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Vulnerability Scanner, and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Unique Categories
Contrast Security is categorized as Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) Tools
Veracode Application Security Platform is categorized as AI AppSec Assistants, Penetration Testing, Static Code Analysis, and Secure Code Review
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Contrast Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Veracode Application Security Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Insurance
13.7%
Information Technology and Services
9.8%
Computer Software
9.8%
Telecommunications
7.8%
Financial Services
7.8%
Other
51.0%
Information Technology and Services
30.4%
Hospital & Health Care
13.0%
Consumer Goods
8.7%
Computer Software
8.7%
Telecommunications
4.3%
Other
34.8%
Discussions
Contrast Security has no discussions with answers
Veracode Application Security Platform has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
