Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ContextQA and Tricentis Testim 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
ContextQA
Star Rating
(130)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ContextQATricentis Testim
Star Rating
(50)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Tricentis TestimSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Tricentis Testim excels in its Test History feature, scoring 9.4, which allows teams to easily track and analyze past test results, while ContextQA, although strong, does not provide the same level of historical insight.
- Reviewers mention that ContextQA shines in Test Feedback with a score of 9.5, highlighting its ability to provide actionable insights and suggestions for test improvements, whereas Tricentis Testim's score of 8.0 indicates room for enhancement in this area.
- G2 users note that both products have an equal score of 9.5 for Ease of Setup, but users on G2 emphasize that Tricentis Testim's onboarding process is particularly user-friendly, making it easier for teams to get started quickly.
- Users say that ContextQA's customization options, rated at 9.1, allow for more tailored testing experiences compared to Tricentis Testim's score of 8.7, which some reviewers feel limits flexibility in adapting the software to specific needs.
- Reviewers mention that Tricentis Testim has a solid score of 9.0 for Test Variety, but users report that ContextQA outperforms it with a score of 9.4, providing a broader range of testing types and scenarios that can be executed.
- Users report that ContextQA's reliability, rated at 9.5, is frequently praised for its consistent performance during automated testing, while Tricentis Testim's score of 8.7 suggests that some users have experienced occasional reliability issues.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ContextQA
No pricing availableTricentis Testim
No pricing availableFree Trial
ContextQA
Free Trial is available
Tricentis Testim
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
112
8.9
38
Ease of Use
9.5
120
9.3
40
Ease of Setup
9.4
89
9.6
12
Ease of Admin
9.7
23
9.0
12
Quality of Support
9.5
110
9.2
39
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
23
8.9
12
Product Direction (% positive)
9.9
109
9.4
40
Features by Category
Functionality
9.5
68
8.3
6
9.4
68
8.7
5
9.1
64
8.9
6
9.4
65
8.9
6
Automation
9.4
63
8.1
6
9.5
64
8.6
6
9.5
64
8.6
6
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ContextQA and Tricentis Testim are categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AI Software Testing Tools
Unique Categories
ContextQA has no unique categories
Tricentis Testim has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ContextQA
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tricentis Testim
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
45.0%
Information Technology and Services
26.4%
Marketing and Advertising
6.2%
Human Resources
3.9%
Accounting
3.9%
Other
14.7%
Computer Software
44.7%
Information Technology and Services
12.8%
Marketing and Advertising
8.5%
Internet
6.4%
Program Development
4.3%
Other
23.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
ContextQA has no discussions with answers
Tricentis Testim has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
