Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ContextQA and QA Wolf 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (55.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us 9999 Tests
ContextQA
Star Rating
(130)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ContextQAQA Wolf
Star Rating
(174)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (55.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 9999 Tests
Learn more about QA WolfSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that both QA Wolf and ContextQA excel in ease of setup, with ContextQA slightly ahead at 9.5 compared to QA Wolf's 9.4. Reviewers mention that ContextQA's streamlined onboarding process makes it particularly user-friendly for small businesses.
- Reviewers mention that QA Wolf shines in quality of support, scoring an impressive 9.9, while ContextQA follows closely with 9.5. Users on G2 highlight QA Wolf's responsive customer service and personalized assistance as standout features.
- Users say that ContextQA offers better customization options, scoring 9.1 compared to QA Wolf's 8.7. Reviewers mention that ContextQA allows for more tailored testing scenarios, which is particularly beneficial for businesses with unique needs.
- G2 users report that both products have a strong product direction, with identical scores of 9.9. Reviewers mention that both QA Wolf and ContextQA are committed to continuous improvement and regularly update their features based on user feedback.
- Users on G2 highlight that ContextQA has a slight edge in reliability, scoring 9.5 versus QA Wolf's 9.2. Reviewers mention that ContextQA's consistent performance during testing phases is a key factor for teams looking for dependable software.
- Reviewers mention that while both products have high ratings for test feedback, ContextQA edges out with a score of 9.5 compared to QA Wolf's 9.4. Users say that ContextQA's feedback mechanisms are more intuitive, making it easier to implement changes based on test results.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ContextQA
No pricing availableQA Wolf
Zero-effort automated QA
Contact Us
9999 Tests
We get you to 80% end-to-end test coverage in 4 months — and keep you there. No matter how many tests your web app needs, you'll get unlimited, parallel test runs on our infrastructure. Even better, we guarantee zero flakes. It’s like magic but it’s QA Wolf.
- Unlimited, parallel test runs
- Hosted parallel run infrastructure included
- Guaranteed zero flakes
Free Trial
ContextQA
Free Trial is available
QA Wolf
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
112
9.3
168
Ease of Use
9.5
120
9.2
170
Ease of Setup
9.4
89
9.2
101
Ease of Admin
9.7
23
9.3
59
Quality of Support
9.5
110
9.9
168
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
23
9.8
60
Product Direction (% positive)
9.9
109
9.7
168
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.5
68
9.4
103
9.4
68
9.3
103
9.1
64
8.7
101
9.4
65
9.3
102
Automation
9.4
63
9.5
102
9.5
64
9.3
101
9.5
64
9.4
101
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
6.3
10
Not enough data
7.3
10
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
7.6
19
Not enough data
6.8
17
Not enough data
7.3
17
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ContextQA and QA Wolf are categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AI Software Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ContextQA
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
QA Wolf
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
45.0%
Information Technology and Services
26.4%
Marketing and Advertising
6.2%
Human Resources
3.9%
Accounting
3.9%
Other
14.7%
Computer Software
40.8%
Marketing and Advertising
6.9%
Automotive
5.2%
Hospital & Health Care
4.6%
Information Technology and Services
3.4%
Other
39.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
ContextQA has no discussions with answers
QA Wolf has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
