Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ContextQA and IBM Engineering Test Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
0.00 USD
ContextQA
Star Rating
(130)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ContextQAIBM Engineering Test Management
Star Rating
(25)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that IBM Engineering Test Management excels in its robust test repository, allowing for efficient organization and management of test cases, while ContextQA shines with its user-friendly interface that simplifies navigation and enhances ease of use.
- Reviewers mention that ContextQA offers superior ease of setup and administration, with a score of 9.5 in both areas, compared to IBM Engineering Test Management's scores of 9.0 and 9.3, respectively, making it a more accessible choice for small businesses.
- G2 users highlight that IBM Engineering Test Management provides strong functionality in test feedback and test history, scoring 9.5 and 9.4, respectively, which is crucial for teams needing detailed insights into testing processes.
- Users on G2 report that ContextQA's quality of support is significantly higher, with a score of 9.5, compared to IBM Engineering Test Management's 7.5, indicating a more responsive and helpful support team for troubleshooting and guidance.
- Reviewers say that IBM Engineering Test Management has a more extensive integration capability, which is essential for larger enterprises needing to connect with various tools, while ContextQA is noted for its strong customization options, allowing users to tailor the software to their specific needs.
- Users report that ContextQA's product direction is highly rated at 9.9, suggesting a strong commitment to continuous improvement and innovation, whereas IBM Engineering Test Management's score of 6.1 indicates potential concerns about its future development and feature enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ContextQA
No pricing availableIBM Engineering Test Management
Free Trial
0.00
USD
- Free trial with no commitment and no credit card
Free Trial
ContextQA
Free Trial is available
IBM Engineering Test Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
112
9.1
9
Ease of Use
9.5
120
7.2
9
Ease of Setup
9.4
89
9.0
5
Ease of Admin
9.7
23
9.3
5
Quality of Support
9.5
110
7.5
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
23
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
9.9
109
6.1
9
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.5
68
Not enough data
9.4
68
Not enough data
9.1
64
Not enough data
9.4
65
Not enough data
Automation
9.4
63
Not enough data
9.5
64
Not enough data
9.5
64
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ContextQA and IBM Engineering Test Management are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
ContextQA is categorized as AI Software Testing Tools
IBM Engineering Test Management is categorized as Test Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ContextQA
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
IBM Engineering Test Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
45.0%
Information Technology and Services
26.4%
Marketing and Advertising
6.2%
Human Resources
3.9%
Accounting
3.9%
Other
14.7%
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Automotive
16.7%
Computer Software
11.1%
Warehousing
5.6%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
5.6%
Other
27.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
ContextQA has no discussions with answers
IBM Engineering Test Management has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
