Users report that Umbraco excels in its customizable templated workflows, allowing for a more tailored content management experience, while Contentful's workflows are noted to be less flexible, which can hinder user adaptability.
Reviewers mention that Umbraco's web content dedication is rated highly at 8.6, indicating a strong focus on delivering quality web content, whereas Contentful shines with a perfect score of 9.3, showcasing its robust capabilities in this area.
G2 users highlight Umbraco's ease of use with a score of 8.7, making it more approachable for small businesses, while Contentful, with a score of 8.4, is perceived as slightly more complex, which may require additional training for new users.
Reviewers say that Umbraco's asset management features are rated at 8.0, which is satisfactory, but Contentful's score of 7.8 indicates that it may not meet the expectations of users looking for advanced asset management capabilities.
Users on G2 report that Umbraco's multi-language support is rated at 8.5, which is beneficial for businesses targeting diverse markets, while Contentful's higher score of 8.8 suggests it offers superior features for internationalization.
Reviewers mention that Umbraco's developer tools are rated at 8.8, providing a strong foundation for developers, while Contentful's score of 8.9 indicates it may offer slightly better tools for developers looking for advanced functionalities.
This is the stand-alone version of the friendly Umbraco CMS. It gives you all of the powerful features and flexibility you'll need to build great websites. Also comes in 2 paid tiers which include support and add-on products.
You can do dynamic validation on anything, but it would require that you wrap the open source contentful field editors with your own javascript validation...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.