Users report that Oracle WebCenter Content excels in Web Content Dedication with a score of 9.3, indicating a strong focus on managing web content effectively, while Contentful, although robust, does not match this level of specialization.
Reviewers mention that Contentful shines in API / Integrations with a score of 8.7, making it easier for developers to connect with other systems, whereas Oracle WebCenter Content's score of 7.6 suggests it may not be as flexible in this area.
G2 users highlight that Oracle WebCenter Content's Rich Text Editor is rated at 8.4, providing a more user-friendly experience for content creation compared to Contentful's score of 7.8, which some users find less intuitive.
Users on G2 report that Contentful's Multi-language support is impressive with a score of 8.8, making it a better choice for businesses operating in multiple regions, while Oracle WebCenter Content's score of 8.8 is also strong but lacks the same level of user feedback.
Reviewers say that Oracle WebCenter Content's Approval Process is rated at 8.3, which is seen as more streamlined compared to Contentful's score of 7.9, indicating that users may find it easier to manage content approvals in Oracle's system.
Users report that Contentful's Customization capabilities are rated at 8.2, allowing for greater flexibility in tailoring the platform to specific needs, while Oracle WebCenter Content's score of 8.0 suggests it may not offer the same level of adaptability.
You can do dynamic validation on anything, but it would require that you wrap the open source contentful field editors with your own javascript validation...Read more
What is Contentful used for?
1 Comment
D
Managing the content of the application in the cloud whether its Mobile App or Website Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.