Users report that Contentful excels in developer tools with a score of 8.9, making it a preferred choice for teams that prioritize API integrations and automation capabilities. In contrast, django CMS, while still strong, does not match this level of developer support.
Reviewers mention that the rich text editor in django CMS is highly rated at 9.2, providing a more user-friendly content authoring experience compared to Contentful's score of 7.8. This makes django CMS a better option for users who prioritize ease of content creation.
G2 users highlight that Contentful's asset management feature scores 7.8, which is notably higher than django CMS's 6.9. This indicates that Contentful offers a more robust solution for managing digital assets, which is crucial for content-heavy websites.
Users on G2 report that django CMS shines in mobile responsiveness with a score of 8.9, while Contentful scores lower at 7.2. This makes django CMS a better fit for businesses that require a mobile-optimized experience.
Reviewers mention that Contentful's multi-language support is rated at 8.8, which is essential for global businesses, while django CMS's score of 8.6 is still strong but slightly less impressive. This gives Contentful an edge for companies targeting diverse markets.
Users say that the quality of support for django CMS is rated at 9.3, significantly higher than Contentful's 8.4. This suggests that users may find more reliable assistance and resources when using django CMS, which can be a critical factor for ongoing operations.
You can do dynamic validation on anything, but it would require that you wrap the open source contentful field editors with your own javascript validation...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.