Compare ContentBox vs Contentstack

See this
comparison of ContentBox vs. Contentstack
based on data from user reviews. ContentBox rates 3.9/5 stars with 5 reviews. Contentstack rates 4.7/5 stars with 15 reviews. Each product's score is calculated by real-time data from verified user reviews.

Pricing

 
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial
ContentBox
Free Trial Unavailable
Contentstack
Free Trial

Ratings

Meets Requirements
Meets Requirements
7.7
9.4
Ease of Use
Ease of Use
8.0
9.6
Ease of Setup
Ease of SetupNot enough data available
9.4
Ease of Admin
Ease of AdminNot enough data available
9.6
Quality of Support
Quality of Support
8.7
9.8
Ease of Doing Business With
Ease of Doing Business WithNot enough data available
10.0
Product Direction (% positive)
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
10.0
Meets Requirements
ContentBox
7.7
Contentstack
9.4
Ease of Use
ContentBox
8.0
Contentstack
9.6
Ease of Setup
ContentBox
Not enough data available
Contentstack
9.4
Ease of Admin
ContentBox
Not enough data available
Contentstack
9.6
Quality of Support
ContentBox
8.7
Contentstack
9.8
Ease of Doing Business With
ContentBox
Not enough data available
Contentstack
10.0
Product Direction (% positive)
ContentBox
10.0
Contentstack
10.0

Features

Content
Content Authoring
ContentBox
8.0
Contentstack
9.7
Rich Text Editor
ContentBox
8.3
Contentstack
9.4
Versioning
ContentBox
8.0
Contentstack
9.5
Plug-ins/Widgets/Apps
ContentBox
6.7
Contentstack
9.0
Approval Process
ContentBox
Not enough data available
Contentstack
9.4
Content Queue
ContentBox
7.7
Contentstack
8.9
Asset Management
ContentBox
8.0
Contentstack
9.9
Internal Search
ContentBox
8.3
Contentstack
8.8
Content Repository
ContentBox
8.0
Contentstack
9.3
Design
Breadth of Pre-Built Templates
ContentBox
6.3
Contentstack
8.7
Mobile
ContentBox
8.3
Contentstack
9.8
Branding/Themes
ContentBox
7.3
Contentstack
9.7
Customization
ContentBox
8.7
Contentstack
9.4
Platform
User Community
ContentBox
7.3
Contentstack
8.3
SEO
ContentBox
7.7
Contentstack
9.0
Flexible Navigation Structures
ContentBox
7.7
Contentstack
9.6
User, Role, and Access Management
ContentBox
8.0
Contentstack
9.7
Enterprise Scalability
ContentBox
7.3
Contentstack
9.1
Internationalization
ContentBox
Not enough data available
Contentstack
8.8
Dashboards and Reports
ContentBox
7.3
Contentstack
Not enough data available
API / Integrations
ContentBox
Not enough data available
Contentstack
8.8

Reviewers' Company Size

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
20.0%
26.7%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
40.0%
46.7%
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
40.0%
26.7%
ContentBox
Small-Business
20.0%
Mid-Market
40.0%
Enterprise
40.0%
Contentstack
Small-Business
26.7%
Mid-Market
46.7%
Enterprise
26.7%

Reviewers' Industry

 
Information Technology and Services
40.0%
Marketing and Advertising
13.3%
 
Public Relations and Communications
20.0%
Hospitality
13.3%
 
Insurance
20.0%
Public Safety
6.7%
 
Accounting
20.0%
Online Media
6.7%
 
Legal Services
6.7%
 
Other
0.0%
Other
53.3%
ContentBox
Information Technology and Services
40.0%
Public Relations and Communications
20.0%
Insurance
20.0%
Accounting
20.0%
Other
0.0%
Contentstack
Marketing and Advertising
13.3%
Hospitality
13.3%
Public Safety
6.7%
Online Media
6.7%
Legal Services
6.7%
Other
53.3%

Reviews

Most Helpful Favorable Review
Most Helpful Favorable Review
chandini g.
User

ContentBox is one of a developing number of items offered by Ortus Solutions. In the CFML designer world, they're, as I would see it, the most dynamic and inventive gathering. They're effectively creating and supporting it, so it's something we felt happy...

Vincent S.
User

First and foremost we like that Contentstack is a pure SaaS headless CMS. They have taken great care to develop virtually every feature a headless CMS could need, while avoiding the siren call of developing features that would steer their product away from...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Most Helpful Critical Review
Vijay R.
Internal Consultant in Accounting

It's not as developed as more established substance the board frameworks. It's only not as fight tried, and support for edge cases or increasingly complex setups aren't really implicit. Parts, similar to the inherent blog/remarks highlights, are decent for...

Rebecca S.
User in Online Media

Not much, really--it works well. The only flaw might be that it's almost too easy to use, so folks who have worked on other CMSes can introduce errors by overcoding. But that's easily seen and fixed in the staging environment.

 
ContentBox
Most Helpful Favorable Review
chandini g.
User

ContentBox is one of a developing number of items offered by Ortus Solutions. In the CFML designer world, they're, as I would see it, the most dynamic and inventive gathering. They're effectively creating and supporting it, so it's something we felt happy...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Vijay R.
Internal Consultant in Accounting

It's not as developed as more established substance the board frameworks. It's only not as fight tried, and support for edge cases or increasingly complex setups aren't really implicit. Parts, similar to the inherent blog/remarks highlights, are decent for...

Contentstack
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Vincent S.
User

First and foremost we like that Contentstack is a pure SaaS headless CMS. They have taken great care to develop virtually every feature a headless CMS could need, while avoiding the siren call of developing features that would steer their product away from...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Rebecca S.
User in Online Media

Not much, really--it works well. The only flaw might be that it's almost too easy to use, so folks who have worked on other CMSes can introduce errors by overcoding. But that's easily seen and fixed in the staging environment.

Screenshots

 No screenshots provided
1 of 4
2 of 4
3 of 4
4 of 4
ContentBox
No screenshots provided
Ask ContentBox a QuestionContact ContentBoxAsk Contentstack a QuestionContact Contentstack