Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Confluent and Pusher

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Confluent
Confluent
Star Rating
(112)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (34.9% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Confluent
Pusher
Pusher
Star Rating
(11)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Pusher
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Confluent excels in real-time processing with a score of 9.0, which reviewers mention is crucial for applications requiring immediate data updates, while Pusher, although strong, does not match this level of performance.
  • Reviewers mention that Confluent's integration capabilities are robust, scoring 8.8, allowing seamless connections with various data sources, whereas Pusher's integration score is lower, indicating potential challenges in connecting with certain platforms.
  • G2 users highlight that Confluent's data transformation features score 8.1, providing advanced capabilities for manipulating data, while Pusher lacks similar depth in this area, which may limit users looking for comprehensive data handling.
  • Users on G2 report that Confluent's quality of support is rated at 8.3, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, contrasting with Pusher's lower score of 7.6, where users have expressed concerns about slower response times.
  • Reviewers mention that Confluent's real-time analytics capabilities score 8.9, making it a preferred choice for businesses needing detailed insights quickly, while Pusher's analytics features are not as comprehensive, which may hinder data-driven decision-making.
  • Users say that Confluent's performance and reliability score of 8.8 is a significant advantage, as many reviewers emphasize the platform's stability during high-load scenarios, whereas Pusher's performance metrics suggest it may not handle heavy workloads as effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Confluent
No pricing available
Pusher
No pricing available
Free Trial
Confluent
Free Trial is available
Pusher
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
87
8.3
9
Ease of Use
8.4
88
8.5
9
Ease of Setup
8.2
38
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.1
38
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.3
81
7.6
7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
35
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
88
8.7
9
Features by Category
Event Stream ProcessingHide 5 FeaturesShow 5 Features
8.7
67
Not enough data
Data
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.8
59
Not enough data
8.8
63
Not enough data
9.0
63
Not enough data
Analytics
8.3
57
Not enough data
Communication Platform as a Service (CPaaS)Hide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Big Data Processing and DistributionHide 10 FeaturesShow 10 Features
8.3
23
Not enough data
Database
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.7
17
Not enough data
8.3
15
Not enough data
Integrations
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.2
14
Not enough data
Platform
8.2
17
Not enough data
7.8
16
Not enough data
8.2
14
Not enough data
Processing
8.2
16
Not enough data
8.3
17
Not enough data
8.3
26
Not enough data
Data Transformation
8.9
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
20
|
Verified
Not enough data
Connectivity
8.2
17
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
19
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
19
|
Verified
Not enough data
Operations
8.3
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
21
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
18
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Confluent
Confluent
Pusher
Pusher
Confluent and Pusher are categorized as Stream Analytics
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Confluent
Confluent
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
34.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
34.9%
Pusher
Pusher
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
63.6%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
36.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
0%
Reviewers' Industry
Confluent
Confluent
Computer Software
22.0%
Information Technology and Services
15.6%
Financial Services
13.8%
Retail
5.5%
Banking
5.5%
Other
37.6%
Pusher
Pusher
Computer Software
18.2%
Telecommunications
9.1%
Restaurants
9.1%
Pharmaceuticals
9.1%
Marketing and Advertising
9.1%
Other
45.5%
Alternatives
Confluent
Confluent Alternatives
Lenses
Lenses
Add Lenses
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Add Apache Kafka
Amazon Kinesis Data Streams
Amazon Kinesis Data Streams
Add Amazon Kinesis Data Streams
Cloudera
Cloudera
Add Cloudera
Pusher
Pusher Alternatives
Twilio
Twilio
Add Twilio
Zapier
Zapier
Add Zapier
Vonage Communications APIs
Vonage Communications APIs
Add Vonage Communications APIs
Datadog
Datadog
Add Datadog
Discussions
Confluent
Confluent Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Confluent has no discussions with answers
Pusher
Pusher Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Pusher has no discussions with answers