Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Confluent and Hadoop HDFS 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kpow for Apache Kafka®
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (34.9% of reviews)
Enterprise (55.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Confluent
Star Rating
(112)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (34.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ConfluentHadoop HDFS
Star Rating
(141)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (55.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Hadoop HDFSSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Hadoop HDFS excels in data distribution with a score of 9.1, making it a strong choice for organizations needing to manage large datasets across multiple nodes. In contrast, Confluent scores 8.7 in this area, indicating it may not be as robust for extensive data distribution needs.
- Reviewers mention that Confluent shines in real-time data collection, achieving a score of 9.0, which is higher than Hadoop HDFS's score of 8.5. This makes Confluent a better option for businesses that require immediate data insights and processing.
- G2 users highlight that Hadoop HDFS has superior integration capabilities with a score of 9.1 for Hadoop integration, while Confluent scores 8.3. This suggests that users looking for seamless integration with Hadoop ecosystems may prefer HDFS.
- Users on G2 report that Confluent offers better ease of use with a score of 8.4 compared to Hadoop HDFS's 7.5. This indicates that Confluent may be more user-friendly, making it suitable for teams with less technical expertise.
- Reviewers mention that Hadoop HDFS has a strong performance and reliability score of 8.4, while Confluent outperforms it slightly with a score of 8.8. This suggests that Confluent may provide a more stable experience for critical applications.
- Users say that Confluent's quality of support is rated higher at 8.3 compared to Hadoop HDFS's 7.8, indicating that users may find better assistance and resources when using Confluent for their data streaming needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Confluent
No pricing availableHadoop HDFS
No pricing availableFree Trial
Confluent
Free Trial is available
Hadoop HDFS
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
87
8.6
118
Ease of Use
8.4
88
7.5
120
Ease of Setup
8.2
38
6.9
47
Ease of Admin
8.1
38
7.1
44
Quality of Support
8.3
81
7.8
103
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
35
7.7
42
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
88
8.0
113
Features by Category
Data
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.8
59
Not enough data
8.8
63
Not enough data
9.0
63
Not enough data
Analytics
8.3
57
Not enough data
Database
9.0
18
8.6
42
8.7
17
9.1
46
8.3
15
9.0
40
Integrations
8.3
12
9.1
44
8.2
14
8.8
40
Platform
8.2
17
8.3
40
7.8
16
8.4
43
8.2
14
8.8
40
Processing
8.2
16
8.7
36
8.3
17
8.5
41
Data Transformation
8.9
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
20
|
Verified
Not enough data
Connectivity
8.2
17
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
19
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
19
|
Verified
Not enough data
Operations
8.3
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
21
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
18
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Confluent and Hadoop HDFS are categorized as Big Data Processing and Distribution
Unique Categories
Hadoop HDFS has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Confluent
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Hadoop HDFS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
22.0%
Information Technology and Services
15.6%
Financial Services
13.8%
Retail
5.5%
Banking
5.5%
Other
37.6%
Computer Software
24.0%
Information Technology and Services
21.7%
Internet
7.8%
Financial Services
4.7%
Higher Education
3.9%
Other
38.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Confluent has no discussions with answers
What is Hadoop HDFS used for?
1 Comment
VV
Hadoop HDFS is used for storing large volume of data... so called 'Big Data'.
Read more
Hadoop HDFS has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
