Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Confluent and Google Cloud Pub/Sub 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kpow for Apache Kafka®
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (34.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (41.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Confluent
Star Rating
(112)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (34.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ConfluentGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
Star Rating
(36)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Cloud Pub/SubSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Confluent excels in real-time processing with a score of 9.0, which reviewers mention is crucial for applications requiring immediate data updates, while Google Cloud Pub/Sub also performs well but slightly lower at 8.7.
- Reviewers mention that Confluent's asynchronous messaging capabilities are rated at 9.0, making it a strong choice for applications needing reliable message delivery, whereas Google Cloud Pub/Sub, while effective, has a lower rating of 8.9 in this area.
- G2 users highlight that Confluent's integration capabilities, particularly with Hadoop and Spark, are rated at 8.3 and 8.2 respectively, which users say is beneficial for big data applications, while Google Cloud Pub/Sub has slightly better integration scores of 8.6 for Spark, indicating a more robust ecosystem for certain users.
- Users on G2 report that Confluent's ease of setup is rated at 8.2, which some reviewers find less intuitive compared to Google Cloud Pub/Sub's higher score of 8.8, suggesting that new users may find Google’s platform more user-friendly.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms have similar quality of support ratings at 8.3, but users say that Confluent's support is particularly responsive, which can be a deciding factor for enterprises needing quick resolutions.
- Users report that Confluent shines in real-time data collection with a score of 9.0, which is essential for analytics-driven businesses, while Google Cloud Pub/Sub, with a score of 8.7, is still effective but may not meet the same level of immediacy for all users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Confluent
No pricing availableGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
No pricing availableFree Trial
Confluent
Free Trial is available
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
87
9.2
26
Ease of Use
8.4
88
8.6
27
Ease of Setup
8.2
38
9.0
8
Ease of Admin
8.1
38
7.8
6
Quality of Support
8.3
81
8.8
23
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
35
8.7
5
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
88
8.2
26
Features by Category
Data
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.8
59
Not enough data
8.8
63
Not enough data
9.0
63
Not enough data
Analytics
8.3
57
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
13
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
7.4
12
Integration
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Management
Not enough data
8.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.8
12
Agentic AI - Message Queue (MQ)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.7
17
Not enough data
8.3
15
Not enough data
Integrations
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.2
14
Not enough data
Platform
8.2
17
Not enough data
7.8
16
Not enough data
8.2
14
Not enough data
Processing
8.2
16
Not enough data
8.3
17
Not enough data
Data Transformation
8.9
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
20
|
Verified
Not enough data
Connectivity
8.2
17
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
19
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
19
|
Verified
Not enough data
Operations
8.3
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
21
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
18
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Confluent and Google Cloud Pub/Sub are categorized as Stream Analytics
Unique Categories
Confluent is categorized as Event Stream Processing, Big Data Processing and Distribution, and Big Data Analytics
Google Cloud Pub/Sub is categorized as Message Queue (MQ)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Confluent
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
22.0%
Information Technology and Services
15.6%
Financial Services
13.8%
Retail
5.5%
Banking
5.5%
Other
37.6%
Computer Software
22.6%
Education Management
16.1%
Marketing and Advertising
9.7%
Retail
6.5%
Information Services
6.5%
Other
38.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Confluent has no discussions with answers
Google Cloud Pub/Sub has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
