Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Confluent and Decodable 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kpow for Apache Kafka®
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (34.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Confluent
Star Rating
(112)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (34.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ConfluentDecodable
Star Rating
(16)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about DecodableSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Confluent excels in real-time processing with a score of 9.0, making it a preferred choice for organizations needing immediate data insights. In contrast, Decodable also offers strong real-time analytics but with a slightly lower score of 8.3, indicating that while it performs well, it may not match Confluent's capabilities in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Confluent's integration options are robust, particularly with its API management and pre-built connectors, which facilitate seamless connectivity with various data sources. Decodable, while offering good integration capabilities, has received feedback that its integration APIs, scoring 9.7, are particularly strong, suggesting a focus on ease of use in connecting to other systems.
- G2 users highlight that Confluent's disaster recovery features score an impressive 9.0, ensuring data safety and business continuity. On the other hand, Decodable's remote backup feature, scoring 7.7, has been noted as an area for improvement, indicating potential vulnerabilities in data recovery processes.
- Users on G2 report that Confluent's quality of support is rated at 8.3, which is commendable, but Decodable shines with a higher score of 9.3, suggesting that users may find more responsive and helpful support when using Decodable.
- Reviewers mention that Confluent's performance and reliability score of 8.8 is strong, but Decodable's score of 8.3 indicates that while it is reliable, it may not perform as consistently under heavy workloads compared to Confluent.
- Users say that Confluent's data transformation capabilities are well-regarded, particularly for its flexibility and efficiency, while Decodable's data modeling feature, scoring 8.9, is praised for its user-friendly interface, making it easier for users to create and manage data models.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Confluent
No pricing availableDecodable
No pricing availableFree Trial
Confluent
Free Trial is available
Decodable
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
87
9.2
11
Ease of Use
8.4
88
8.5
11
Ease of Setup
8.2
38
8.9
6
Ease of Admin
8.1
38
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.3
81
9.4
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
35
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
88
8.9
11
Features by Category
Data
8.8
63
8.7
5
8.8
59
9.0
5
8.8
63
10.0
5
9.0
63
9.3
5
Analytics
8.3
57
9.0
5
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Diverse Extraction Points
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Solution Provision
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Development
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration Options
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.7
17
Not enough data
8.3
15
Not enough data
Integrations
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.2
14
Not enough data
Platform
8.2
17
Not enough data
7.8
16
Not enough data
8.2
14
Not enough data
Processing
8.2
16
Not enough data
8.3
17
Not enough data
Data Transformation
8.9
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
20
|
Verified
Not enough data
Connectivity
8.2
17
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
19
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
19
|
Verified
Not enough data
Operations
8.3
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
21
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
18
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Confluent and Decodable are categorized as Event Stream Processing, Stream Analytics, and Big Data Processing and Distribution
Unique Categories
Confluent is categorized as Big Data Analytics
Decodable is categorized as iPaaS, Big Data Integration Platforms, ETL Tools, Data Replication, and Data Extraction
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Confluent
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Decodable
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
22.0%
Information Technology and Services
15.6%
Financial Services
13.8%
Retail
5.5%
Banking
5.5%
Other
37.6%
Computer & Network Security
18.8%
Non-Profit Organization Management
12.5%
Marketing and Advertising
12.5%
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Education Management
12.5%
Other
31.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
Confluent has no discussions with answers
Decodable has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
