Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Confluence and XWiki 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Helpjuice
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
BlueDocs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (38.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 10 Users Per Month
Free 0 Community
Confluence
Star Rating
(4,147)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 10 Users Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansXWiki
Star Rating
(13)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 0 Community
Browse all 5 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Confluence excels in its "Content Editor" feature, allowing for a more intuitive and user-friendly experience when creating and editing documents, while XWiki's editor is noted for being less straightforward, which can hinder ease of use.
- Reviewers mention that XWiki offers a "Free" entry-level price, making it more accessible for small teams or startups, whereas Confluence starts at $10 per month, which may be a barrier for some users.
- G2 users highlight that Confluence has a robust "Versioning and Version History" feature, which is crucial for teams needing to track changes over time, while XWiki's versioning capabilities are seen as less comprehensive.
- Users on G2 appreciate Confluence's "Quality of Support," rating it at 8.0, while XWiki shines with a higher score of 8.8, indicating that users find XWiki's support more responsive and helpful.
- Reviewers say that XWiki's "Knowledge Sharing" capabilities are rated highly at 9.2, suggesting that it facilitates better collaboration and dissemination of information compared to Confluence, which has a lower score in this area.
- Users report that Confluence's "Page Analytics" feature is beneficial for tracking engagement, but XWiki's analytics tools are perceived as less effective, which may impact decision-making for content strategies.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Confluence
Free
Free
10 Users Per Month
Free forever for 10 users
- Pages & Spaces
- Organize & connect work with databases
- Hundreds of templates
XWiki
Community
Free
0 Community
Always free, on-premises. Yours to set up.
- Community extensions
Free Trial
Confluence
Free Trial is available
XWiki
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
3,540
8.5
12
Ease of Use
8.0
3,570
8.5
12
Ease of Setup
8.2
1,074
7.7
5
Ease of Admin
8.0
823
8.0
5
Quality of Support
8.1
2,405
8.8
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
742
8.7
5
Product Direction (% positive)
7.5
3,483
7.1
12
Features by Category
Knowledge Pages
8.5
745
Not enough data
8.4
722
Not enough data
8.8
746
Not enough data
8.3
640
Not enough data
7.8
426
Not enough data
8.6
483
Not enough data
Knowledge Dissemination
8.3
659
Not enough data
8.6
746
Not enough data
9.1
794
Not enough data
8.6
770
Not enough data
8.1
465
Feature Not Available
7.8
412
Feature Not Available
8.8
466
Not enough data
8.3
442
Not enough data
8.5
434
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Knowledge Base
7.5
167
Not enough data
7.5
166
Not enough data
7.4
165
Not enough data
Login Options
9.1
36
Not enough data
8.2
31
Not enough data
Productivity
7.4
31
Not enough data
8.0
31
Not enough data
8.0
32
Not enough data
7.3
30
Not enough data
7.7
31
Not enough data
Customization
8.0
31
Not enough data
8.9
31
Not enough data
8.0
30
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Unified Workspaces
7.1
27
Not enough data
7.6
28
Not enough data
Automation
8.5
46
Not enough data
8.6
43
Not enough data
8.6
45
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
44
Not enough data
8.3
44
Not enough data
9.0
41
Not enough data
Project management
8.7
42
Not enough data
8.3
42
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.5
44
Not enough data
8.3
43
Not enough data
7.7
42
Not enough data
8.3
43
Not enough data
Workload
7.7
43
Not enough data
8.3
42
Not enough data
8.5
44
Not enough data
7.9
42
Not enough data
Communication & Collaboration
8.5
43
Not enough data
9.1
46
Not enough data
8.9
47
Not enough data
Cost Management
7.7
43
Not enough data
7.8
43
Not enough data
7.6
42
Not enough data
Integration
7.9
39
Not enough data
7.7
42
Not enough data
7.6
41
Not enough data
Generative AI
8.0
42
Not enough data
8.0
41
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Work Management
7.5
38
Not enough data
7.6
39
Not enough data
7.7
39
Not enough data
7.9
38
Not enough data
Communication
7.1
56
Not enough data
8.4
58
Not enough data
7.7
53
Not enough data
8.1
59
Not enough data
8.2
53
Not enough data
Content & Documents
8.9
58
Not enough data
8.9
58
Not enough data
8.7
55
Not enough data
8.9
58
Not enough data
Controls
8.4
53
Not enough data
8.6
54
Not enough data
8.6
55
Not enough data
8.0
52
Not enough data
8.2
52
Not enough data
Project Management
8.2
55
Not enough data
8.5
54
Not enough data
8.9
52
Not enough data
9.0
52
Not enough data
Remote Collaboration
9.1
55
Not enough data
8.8
55
Not enough data
8.7
53
Not enough data
7.1
52
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.8
53
Not enough data
7.7
52
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Project Collaboration
7.1
50
Not enough data
7.6
50
Not enough data
Management and Discovery - IT Documentation
8.4
175
Not enough data
8.5
176
Not enough data
8.5
174
Not enough data
Operations - IT Documentation
8.4
171
Not enough data
8.0
173
Not enough data
8.2
171
Not enough data
Knowledge Base
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Confluence and XWiki are categorized as Knowledge Base
Unique Categories
Confluence is categorized as Project Collaboration, Unified Workspaces, Work Management, and IT Documentation
XWiki has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Confluence
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
XWiki
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
20.9%
Information Technology and Services
19.8%
Internet
6.4%
Financial Services
5.5%
Marketing and Advertising
4.0%
Other
43.4%
Information Technology and Services
23.1%
Computer Software
23.1%
Public Relations and Communications
7.7%
Program Development
7.7%
Pharmaceuticals
7.7%
Other
30.8%
Discussions
What is confluence tool used for?
6 Comments
TS
In short, it is a tool to collaborate on content across an organization, track changes/workflows for policies and procedures, and even act as an internal...Read more
Uses for Confluence?
3 Comments
FP
Yes we use it. We have an internal intranet on sharepoint but we use confluence for all our development documentation because it has its tight integration...Read more
What are the characteristics of confluence?
3 Comments
JK
It's a helpful tool for documentation, summaries, and collaboration. Information is organized and surfaced in a comprehensive (but not overwhelming) format....Read more
XWiki has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
