Compare Confluence and XWiki

Save your comparisonKeep these tools in one place and come back anytime.
Save to board
At a Glance
Confluence
Confluence
Star Rating
(4,340)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.3% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 10 Users Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plans
XWiki
XWiki
Star Rating
(13)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 0 Community
Browse all 5 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that Confluence excels in integrating with tools like JIRA, Slack, and PowerApps, making it a favorite for teams that rely on these platforms for project management and communication. Users appreciate the rich formatting styles and granular permissions, which enhance collaboration and control over shared content.
  • Users say that XWiki offers a familiar interface reminiscent of Wikipedia, which makes it easy for employees to create and update articles. This user-friendly approach fosters a collaborative environment, allowing multiple users to contribute and keep information current.
  • Reviewers mention that Confluence shines in centralizing team knowledge, with many users highlighting its effectiveness in documenting project requirements and maintaining meeting notes. This structured approach ensures that vital information is accessible to the entire team at any time.
  • According to verified reviews, XWiki is praised for its ability to facilitate easy communication among employees, making it a suitable choice for organizations looking to enhance internal collaboration. Users appreciate the platform's professional organization of documents, which helps streamline workflows.
  • G2 reviewers note that while Confluence has a higher overall satisfaction score, XWiki's users rate its support quality slightly higher. This suggests that XWiki may provide more responsive assistance, which can be crucial for teams needing quick resolutions to issues.
  • Users highlight that Confluence's implementation process is generally quick and intuitive, which is a significant advantage for teams looking to get up and running without extensive delays. In contrast, some users of XWiki have reported challenges with setup, indicating that it may require more time and effort to configure effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Confluence
Free
Free
10 Users Per Month
Browse all 4 pricing plans
XWiki
Community
Free
0 Community
Browse all 5 pricing plans
Free Trial
Confluence
Free Trial is available
XWiki
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
3,676
8.5
12
Ease of Use
8.0
3,725
8.5
12
Ease of Setup
8.3
1,217
7.7
5
Ease of Admin
8.0
891
8.0
5
Quality of Support
8.1
2,515
8.8
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
806
8.7
5
Product Direction (% positive)
7.5
3,607
7.1
12
Features by Category
8.3
1,075
Not enough data
Knowledge Pages
8.5
790
Not enough data
8.5
739
Not enough data
8.8
796
Not enough data
8.4
659
Not enough data
7.8
441
Not enough data
8.6
532
Not enough data
Knowledge Dissemination
8.3
674
Not enough data
8.6
785
Not enough data
9.2
889
Not enough data
8.6
795
Not enough data
8.1
492
Feature Not Available
7.8
423
Feature Not Available
8.7
551
Not enough data
8.4
515
Not enough data
8.5
452
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Knowledge Base
7.7
179
Not enough data
7.6
180
Not enough data
7.6
179
Not enough data
8.4
75
Not enough data
Login Options
9.4
57
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
Productivity
7.9
39
Not enough data
8.3
43
Not enough data
8.5
41
Not enough data
8.0
43
Not enough data
8.3
43
Not enough data
Customization
8.4
46
Not enough data
9.1
45
Not enough data
8.6
42
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Unified Workspaces
7.8
37
Not enough data
8.1
40
Not enough data
8.6
95
Not enough data
Automation
8.8
59
Not enough data
8.8
58
Not enough data
8.8
62
Not enough data
Administration
8.8
60
Not enough data
8.6
56
Not enough data
9.2
55
Not enough data
Project management
9.0
57
Not enough data
8.6
57
Not enough data
8.9
58
Not enough data
8.7
58
Not enough data
8.6
54
Not enough data
8.0
53
Not enough data
8.6
59
Not enough data
Workload
8.2
54
Not enough data
8.6
56
Not enough data
8.8
57
Not enough data
8.4
56
Not enough data
Communication & Collaboration
8.8
56
Not enough data
9.3
66
Not enough data
9.2
67
Not enough data
Cost Management
8.0
55
Not enough data
8.1
54
Not enough data
8.0
53
Not enough data
Integration
8.4
52
Not enough data
8.2
55
Not enough data
8.2
54
Not enough data
Generative AI
8.4
56
Not enough data
8.4
55
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Work Management
8.0
50
Not enough data
8.0
51
Not enough data
8.1
51
Not enough data
8.2
51
Not enough data
8.5
124
Not enough data
Communication
7.5
66
Not enough data
8.7
69
Not enough data
8.1
66
Not enough data
8.3
73
Not enough data
8.5
69
Not enough data
Content & Documents
9.0
77
Not enough data
9.0
75
Not enough data
8.8
76
Not enough data
9.0
75
Not enough data
Controls
8.4
65
Not enough data
8.6
67
Not enough data
8.8
69
Not enough data
8.2
65
Not enough data
8.5
67
Not enough data
Project Management
8.5
71
Not enough data
8.7
68
Not enough data
9.0
68
Not enough data
9.2
74
Not enough data
Remote Collaboration
9.0
68
Not enough data
8.9
67
Not enough data
8.8
68
Not enough data
7.5
66
Not enough data
Generative AI
8.2
72
Not enough data
8.2
69
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Project Collaboration
7.6
63
Not enough data
7.9
63
Not enough data
8.4
213
Not enough data
Management and Discovery - IT Documentation
8.4
184
Not enough data
8.5
188
Not enough data
8.5
187
Not enough data
Operations - IT Documentation
8.5
187
Not enough data
8.0
181
Not enough data
8.2
178
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Knowledge Base
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Confluence
Confluence
XWiki
XWiki
Confluence and XWiki are categorized as Knowledge Base
Unique Categories
XWiki
XWiki has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Confluence
Confluence
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
18.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
48.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
33.3%
XWiki
XWiki
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
30.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
38.5%
Reviewers' Industry
Confluence
Confluence
Computer Software
21.0%
Information Technology and Services
19.5%
Internet
6.3%
Financial Services
5.5%
Marketing and Advertising
4.4%
Other
43.4%
XWiki
XWiki
Information Technology and Services
23.1%
Computer Software
23.1%
Public Relations and Communications
7.7%
Program Development
7.7%
Pharmaceuticals
7.7%
Other
30.8%
Alternatives
Confluence
Confluence Alternatives
Slack
Slack
Add Slack
ClickUp
ClickUp
Add ClickUp
Wrike
Wrike
Add Wrike
Bitrix24
Bitrix24
Add Bitrix24
XWiki
XWiki Alternatives
DokuWiki
DokuWiki
Add DokuWiki
Notion
Notion
Add Notion
Guru
Guru
Add Guru
Bloomfire
Bloomfire
Add Bloomfire
Discussions
Confluence
Confluence Discussions
What is confluence tool used for?
6 Comments
TS
In short, it is a tool to collaborate on content across an organization, track changes/workflows for policies and procedures, and even act as an internal...Read more
How is Confluence being utilized to improve knowledge management and collaboration in remote work environments?
3 Comments
Ryszard B.
RB
In my opinion the possibility of sharing and editing knowledge easily is a main power here. Every who has rights to editing files could easy correct them and...Read more
What is Confluence used for?
3 Comments
Pedro  D.
PD
Documentation, Internal knowledge base, blog posts.Read more
XWiki
XWiki Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
XWiki has no discussions with answers