Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Confluence and DokuWiki 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Helpjuice
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
BlueDocs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.1% of reviews)
Small-Business (75.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 10 Users Per Month
No pricing available
Confluence
Star Rating
(4,134)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 10 Users Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansDokuWiki
Star Rating
(12)3.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (75.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about DokuWikiSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Confluence excels in its "Content Editor" feature, allowing for rich formatting and collaboration, while DokuWiki's editor is simpler, which some users find limiting for complex documentation.
- Reviewers mention that Confluence's "Versioning and Version History" capabilities are robust, making it easy to track changes over time, whereas DokuWiki's versioning is less intuitive, leading to some confusion among users.
- G2 users highlight that Confluence's "Knowledge Sharing" feature is highly rated, facilitating seamless collaboration across teams, while DokuWiki's sharing options are more basic, which can hinder effective communication in larger organizations.
- Users on G2 appreciate Confluence's "Page Analytics" for providing insights into content engagement, whereas DokuWiki lacks this feature, making it difficult for users to gauge the effectiveness of their documentation.
- Reviewers say that Confluence offers superior "Notifications" for updates and changes, ensuring users stay informed, while DokuWiki's notification system is less comprehensive, leading to missed updates.
- Users report that Confluence's "Public vs Private" settings are more flexible, allowing for better control over content visibility, while DokuWiki's limitations in this area can restrict user access and sharing options.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Confluence
Free
Free
10 Users Per Month
Free forever for 10 users
- Pages & Spaces
- Organize & connect work with databases
- Hundreds of templates
DokuWiki
No pricing availableFree Trial
Confluence
Free Trial is available
DokuWiki
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
3,530
8.8
8
Ease of Use
8.0
3,560
8.5
8
Ease of Setup
8.2
1,063
8.3
5
Ease of Admin
8.0
820
8.3
5
Quality of Support
8.1
2,397
7.2
6
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
739
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.5
3,473
10.0
8
Features by Category
Knowledge Pages
8.5
739
Not enough data
8.4
720
Not enough data
8.8
741
Not enough data
8.3
638
Not enough data
7.8
425
Not enough data
8.7
478
Not enough data
Knowledge Dissemination
8.3
658
Not enough data
8.6
741
Not enough data
9.1
785
Not enough data
8.6
767
Not enough data
8.1
462
Not enough data
7.8
411
Not enough data
8.8
460
Not enough data
8.3
437
Not enough data
8.5
431
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Knowledge Base
7.5
166
Not enough data
7.5
165
Not enough data
7.4
163
Not enough data
Login Options
9.1
35
Not enough data
8.2
31
Not enough data
Productivity
7.4
31
Not enough data
8.0
31
Not enough data
8.0
32
Not enough data
7.3
30
Not enough data
7.7
31
Not enough data
Customization
8.0
31
Not enough data
8.9
31
Not enough data
8.0
30
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Unified Workspaces
7.1
27
Not enough data
7.6
28
Not enough data
Automation
8.5
44
Not enough data
8.5
41
Not enough data
8.6
43
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
43
Not enough data
8.3
43
Not enough data
9.0
40
Not enough data
Project management
8.7
41
Not enough data
8.3
41
Not enough data
8.6
42
Not enough data
8.5
42
Not enough data
8.3
41
Not enough data
7.7
41
Not enough data
8.3
41
Not enough data
Workload
7.7
41
Not enough data
8.3
41
Not enough data
8.5
42
Not enough data
8.0
41
Not enough data
Communication & Collaboration
8.5
41
Not enough data
9.1
44
Not enough data
8.9
45
Not enough data
Cost Management
7.7
41
Not enough data
7.8
41
Not enough data
7.6
41
Not enough data
Integration
7.9
39
Not enough data
7.7
41
Not enough data
7.6
40
Not enough data
Generative AI
8.0
41
Not enough data
8.0
40
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Work Management
7.6
37
Not enough data
7.6
38
Not enough data
7.8
38
Not enough data
8.0
37
Not enough data
Communication
7.1
55
Not enough data
8.5
57
Not enough data
7.7
52
Not enough data
8.1
57
Not enough data
8.3
52
Not enough data
Content & Documents
8.9
56
Not enough data
8.9
56
Not enough data
8.7
54
Not enough data
8.9
56
Not enough data
Controls
8.4
52
Not enough data
8.6
53
Not enough data
8.6
54
Not enough data
8.0
51
Not enough data
8.2
51
Not enough data
Project Management
8.3
52
Not enough data
8.5
53
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
9.0
51
Not enough data
Remote Collaboration
9.1
54
Not enough data
8.8
54
Not enough data
8.7
52
Not enough data
7.2
51
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.9
51
Not enough data
7.7
51
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Project Collaboration
7.1
49
Not enough data
7.6
49
Not enough data
Management and Discovery - IT Documentation
8.4
174
Not enough data
8.5
175
Not enough data
8.5
172
Not enough data
Operations - IT Documentation
8.5
170
Not enough data
8.0
172
Not enough data
8.2
169
Not enough data
Knowledge Base
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Confluence and DokuWiki are categorized as Knowledge Base
Unique Categories
Confluence is categorized as Project Collaboration, Unified Workspaces, Work Management, and IT Documentation
DokuWiki has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Confluence
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
DokuWiki
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
20.9%
Information Technology and Services
19.8%
Internet
6.5%
Financial Services
5.5%
Marketing and Advertising
4.0%
Other
43.4%
Information Technology and Services
25.0%
Computer Software
16.7%
Banking
16.7%
Law Practice
8.3%
Construction
8.3%
Other
25.0%
Discussions
What is confluence tool used for?
6 Comments
TS
In short, it is a tool to collaborate on content across an organization, track changes/workflows for policies and procedures, and even act as an internal...Read more
Uses for Confluence?
3 Comments
FP
Yes we use it. We have an internal intranet on sharepoint but we use confluence for all our development documentation because it has its tight integration...Read more
What are the characteristics of confluence?
3 Comments
JK
It's a helpful tool for documentation, summaries, and collaboration. Information is organized and surfaced in a comprehensive (but not overwhelming) format....Read more
DokuWiki has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
