Users report that ConEmu excels in customization options, allowing for extensive personalization of the user interface, while TeraTerm's customization features are more limited, which some users find disappointing.
Reviewers mention that ConEmu has superior logging capabilities, with features that allow for detailed session logging, whereas TeraTerm's logging functionality is considered basic by some users.
G2 users highlight ConEmu's strong performance in resource usage, scoring 9.4, which indicates it runs efficiently on systems, while TeraTerm, with a score of 9.2, is also efficient but slightly less so according to user feedback.
Users on G2 appreciate ConEmu's command-line interface, which scores 9.2, as being intuitive and user-friendly, while TeraTerm's command-line interface, although scoring higher at 9.5, is noted by some users to have a steeper learning curve.
Reviewers say that ConEmu's support quality is rated at 8.8, which is slightly higher than TeraTerm's 8.5, indicating that users feel more supported when using ConEmu.
Users report that ConEmu's performance in latency is rated at 8.9, which is comparable to TeraTerm's 9.0, but some users feel that ConEmu provides a more responsive experience overall during heavy usage.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ConEmu
No pricing available
TeraTerm
No pricing available
Free Trial
ConEmu
No trial information available
TeraTerm
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.5
11
8.9
16
Ease of Use
9.4
11
8.8
16
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.8
7
8.5
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.