Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Competera Pricing Platform and QuickLizard 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Vividly
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
INTUENDI
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Everstage
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (61.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Per SKU
Competera Pricing Platform
Star Rating
(15)4.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Competera Pricing PlatformQuickLizard
Star Rating
(23)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Per SKU
Learn more about QuickLizardSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that the Competera Pricing Platform excels in ease of use with a score of 9.7, making it highly accessible for small businesses, while QuickLizard Pricing Optimization has a lower score of 8.0, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Competera's dashboard functionality is rated at 9.4, providing intuitive visualizations that help users quickly interpret pricing data, whereas QuickLizard's dashboard received a score of 8.3, suggesting it may lack some of the user-friendly features found in Competera.
- G2 users highlight Competera's exceptional quality of support, with a perfect score of 10.0, indicating that users feel well-supported, while QuickLizard also scores highly at 10.0, showing both platforms prioritize customer service effectively.
- Users on G2 report that Competera's performance is rated at 9.4, which suggests it handles large datasets efficiently, while QuickLizard's performance score of 9.0 indicates it is also robust but may not be as optimized for extensive data handling.
- Reviewers say that Competera's reporting features, although rated lower at 7.0, are still effective for basic needs, while QuickLizard's reporting capabilities are not highlighted as a strong point, suggesting potential limitations in data analysis.
- Users mention that Competera's interoperability score of 9.0 is a significant advantage, allowing seamless integration with other tools, while QuickLizard's interoperability is not as prominently featured, which may limit its flexibility in diverse tech environments.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Competera Pricing Platform
No pricing availableQuickLizard
SaaS Based Pricing
Per SKU
https://www.quicklizard.com/pricing/
Free Trial
Competera Pricing Platform
No trial information availableQuickLizard
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.5
14
9.4
18
Ease of Use
9.5
14
8.2
19
Ease of Setup
9.3
5
8.0
15
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.8
7
Quality of Support
9.6
14
10.0
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.8
7
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
12
9.4
19
Features by Category
Platform Additional Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
9.6
9
Feature Not Available
5.2
7
Platform Data
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Not enough data
6.3
10
Platform Basics
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
9.2
10
Platform - Pricing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - Pricing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Artificial Intelligence - Pricing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Pricing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Competera Pricing Platform and QuickLizard are categorized as Retail Pricing
Unique Categories
Competera Pricing Platform is categorized as Pricing
QuickLizard has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Competera Pricing Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
QuickLizard
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Retail
35.7%
Consumer Electronics
14.3%
Wholesale
7.1%
Supermarkets
7.1%
Management Consulting
7.1%
Other
28.6%
Retail
42.9%
Consumer Goods
19.0%
Cosmetics
9.5%
Manufacturing
4.8%
Information Technology and Services
4.8%
Other
19.0%
Discussions
Competera Pricing Platform has no discussions with answers
QuickLizard has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
