Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Collaborator and GitHub 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$595.00 Per Year
$0.00 1 users
Collaborator
Star Rating
(12)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$595.00 Per Year
Browse all 2 pricing plansGitHub
Star Rating
(2,264)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its Ease of Use with a score of 8.7, making it a preferred choice for small businesses, while Collaborator, with a score of 8.0, is noted for being more complex, which may not be ideal for smaller teams.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Integration capabilities are robust, scoring 9.1, allowing seamless connections with various tools, whereas Collaborator, despite having a good score of 8.9, lacks some of the extensive third-party integrations that GitHub offers.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's superior Quality of Support with a score of 8.7, indicating that users find it easier to get help when needed, while Collaborator's support, rated at 7.6, has been described as less responsive and less comprehensive.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub's Deployment Automation features, scoring 8.9, are highly effective, streamlining the release process, while Collaborator's score of 8.5 suggests it may not be as efficient in automating deployments.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Task Management features, rated at 8.9, provide a user-friendly interface for tracking progress, while Collaborator's task management capabilities, although decent, do not match the intuitive design and functionality of GitHub.
- Users say that GitHub's Product Direction is promising, with a positive score of 8.9, indicating a strong commitment to continuous improvement, while Collaborator's lower score of 6.5 raises concerns about its future development and feature enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Collaborator
Team
$595.00
Per Year
Purchase up to 5 packs to support 25 users.
Configurable peer code review for teams up to 25.
- Subversion, Git, GitHub, CVS, Mercurial, Perforce and TFS
- Source Code Review
- MySQL Database Support
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Free Trial
Collaborator
Free Trial is available
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
10
9.3
1,962
Ease of Use
8.0
10
8.7
1,978
Ease of Setup
8.3
6
9.0
589
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.7
450
Quality of Support
7.6
7
8.8
1,569
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.9
386
Product Direction (% positive)
6.5
10
8.9
1,914
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Administration
Not enough data
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Analysis
Not enough data
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Testing
Not enough data
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
10.0
14
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
97
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.9
91
IT Management
Not enough data
9.0
99
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Management
Not enough data
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
9.2
77
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
75
Management
Not enough data
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
136
Not enough data
8.6
133
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Processes
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
138
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Management
Not enough data
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Documentation
Not enough data
8.8
184
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Security
Not enough data
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Collaborator and GitHub are categorized as Peer Code Review
Unique Categories
Collaborator has no unique categories
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Continuous Delivery, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Collaborator
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
25.0%
Security and Investigations
8.3%
Internet
8.3%
Information Technology and Services
8.3%
Industrial Automation
8.3%
Other
41.7%
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
Collaborator has no discussions with answers
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
