Compare Collaborator and GitHub 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (45.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$595.00 Per Year
$0.00 1 users
Collaborator
Star Rating
(12)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
$595.00 Per Year
Browse all 2 pricing plansGitHub
Star Rating
(2,333)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that GitHub excels in collaboration features, particularly highlighting its straightforward pull request system that keeps projects organized when multiple users are involved. This makes it a preferred choice for teams looking to streamline their coding processes.
- Users say that Collaborator offers a customizable experience, allowing each user to tailor tools to their specific workflow. This adaptability can be beneficial for teams with diverse needs, although it may not be as intuitive as GitHub's more unified approach.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's implementation process is quick and user-friendly, with many praising its intuitive onboarding wizard. This ease of setup is a significant advantage for teams eager to get started without extensive training.
- According to verified reviews, Collaborator enables real-time concurrent reviews, which is a strong point for global teams needing to collaborate across different time zones. However, some users feel that it lacks the comprehensive version control features that GitHub provides.
- Users highlight GitHub's strong market presence, noting that many companies prioritize candidates with GitHub profiles, underscoring its importance in the software development landscape. This reputation can be a deciding factor for teams looking to attract top talent.
- Reviewers express that while Collaborator has solid code review capabilities, it falls short in overall user satisfaction compared to GitHub, which boasts a significantly higher G2 Score. This suggests that GitHub may provide a more reliable and enjoyable user experience overall.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Collaborator
Team
$595.00
Per Year
Purchase up to 5 packs to support 25 users.
Configurable peer code review for teams up to 25.
- Subversion, Git, GitHub, CVS, Mercurial, Perforce and TFS
- Source Code Review
- MySQL Database Support
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Free Trial
Collaborator
Free Trial is available
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
10
9.3
2,016
Ease of Use
8.0
10
8.7
2,033
Ease of Setup
8.3
6
9.0
645
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.7
453
Quality of Support
7.6
7
8.7
1,612
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.9
389
Product Direction (% positive)
6.5
10
8.9
1,963
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
140
Not enough data
9.0
149
Not enough data
8.6
140
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
144
Not enough data
8.5
126
Not enough data
8.8
131
Not enough data
9.0
145
Not enough data
8.1
127
Processes
Not enough data
9.0
143
Not enough data
8.7
138
Not enough data
8.6
138
Administration
Not enough data
9.0
41
Not enough data
8.8
38
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
40
Not enough data
8.7
43
Not enough data
8.6
40
Not enough data
8.8
45
Testing
Not enough data
9.1
41
Not enough data
8.2
34
Not enough data
8.4
36
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.3
32
Not enough data
8.6
34
Not enough data
8.0
32
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
90
Not enough data
8.6
91
Not enough data
9.1
95
Automation
Not enough data
8.8
90
Not enough data
8.6
83
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
83
IT Management
Not enough data
8.9
94
Not enough data
8.8
84
Not enough data
8.7
79
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
242
Not enough data
9.2
250
Not enough data
8.8
231
Management
Not enough data
9.0
240
Not enough data
8.4
226
Not enough data
9.0
245
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.4
19
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
8.7
22
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.9
187
Not enough data
8.8
182
Not enough data
9.0
186
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.4
181
Not enough data
8.9
197
Not enough data
9.0
179
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
8.6
18
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.8
65
Not enough data
9.0
70
Not enough data
9.1
70
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.7
67
Not enough data
9.0
70
Not enough data
8.8
69
Management
Not enough data
8.8
135
Not enough data
9.1
144
Not enough data
8.6
131
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
142
Not enough data
8.9
139
Not enough data
8.6
127
Processes
Not enough data
8.9
134
Not enough data
8.8
127
Not enough data
9.1
142
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
224
Not enough data
8.9
210
Not enough data
8.6
198
Management
Not enough data
8.8
218
Not enough data
8.8
213
Not enough data
8.2
203
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
8.3
24
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
7.7
25
Not enough data
8.1
24
Documentation
Not enough data
8.7
180
Not enough data
8.7
170
Not enough data
8.5
163
Security
Not enough data
8.2
158
Not enough data
8.5
160
Not enough data
8.9
171
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Collaborator and GitHub are categorized as Peer Code Review
Unique Categories
Collaborator has no unique categories
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Continuous Delivery, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Collaborator
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
25.0%
Security and Investigations
8.3%
Internet
8.3%
Information Technology and Services
8.3%
Industrial Automation
8.3%
Other
41.7%
Computer Software
32.1%
Information Technology and Services
22.5%
Internet
6.6%
Higher Education
3.3%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Discussions
Collaborator has no discussions with answers
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
How is GitHub shaping the landscape of collaborative software development and version control?
4 Comments
MR
GitHub provides a platform for developers across the world to collaborate on projects, regardless of their location. It has become a vital tool for...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.
