Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare CodeScan and Veracode Application Security Platform 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact for Pricing
No pricing available
CodeScan
Star Rating
(34)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact for Pricing
Browse all 3 pricing plansVeracode Application Security Platform
Star Rating
(25)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Veracode Application Security PlatformSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that the Veracode Application Security Platform has a lower ease of setup score (5.7) compared to CodeScan (8.7), indicating that users find CodeScan significantly easier to implement and integrate into their existing workflows.
- Reviewers mention that CodeScan excels in quality of support with a score of 9.0, while Veracode scores 8.0, suggesting that users feel more supported and satisfied with the assistance they receive from CodeScan.
- G2 users highlight that CodeScan has a higher detection rate (8.0) and lower false positives (7.8) compared to Veracode (detection rate 8.3, false positives 5.8), indicating that CodeScan is more effective in identifying vulnerabilities without overwhelming users with false alerts.
- Users on G2 report that CodeScan offers superior reporting and analytics features (8.3) compared to Veracode (8.5), with specific praise for its user-friendly dashboards and actionable insights that help teams prioritize remediation efforts.
- Reviewers say that Veracode shines in its static code analysis capabilities (9.2), which are highly regarded for their thoroughness, while CodeScan also performs well (9.3), but users feel Veracode provides a more comprehensive analysis for complex applications.
- Users report that CodeScan has a more extensive API and integration capabilities (9.2) compared to Veracode (7.9), making it easier for teams to connect with other tools and streamline their security processes.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CodeScan
Cloud
Contact for Pricing
Use CodeScan technology for any
Salesforce instance. Get all the benefits of our Self Hosted service without the need of servers or internal infrastructure. Leverage the CodeScan Cloud and avoid installing, running and maintaining it on your own infrastructure.
- APEX, Visualforce, Lightning, Metadata
- 500+ Rules
- CD/CI Pipeline Integration
Veracode Application Security Platform
No pricing availableFree Trial
CodeScan
Free Trial is available
Veracode Application Security Platform
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
16
8.1
19
Ease of Use
8.6
18
7.3
19
Ease of Setup
8.7
10
5.7
7
Ease of Admin
8.8
12
7.4
7
Quality of Support
9.0
20
8.0
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
12
7.9
7
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
21
6.3
19
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Analysis
8.5
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
5.8
6
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.8
6
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
CodeScan and Veracode Application Security Platform are categorized as Static Code Analysis and Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories
CodeScan has no unique categories
Veracode Application Security Platform is categorized as AI AppSec Assistants, Penetration Testing, Vulnerability Scanner, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Secure Code Review, Software Composition Analysis, and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
CodeScan
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Veracode Application Security Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Computer Software
16.7%
Hospital & Health Care
10.0%
Management Consulting
6.7%
Insurance
6.7%
Other
43.3%
Information Technology and Services
30.4%
Hospital & Health Care
13.0%
Consumer Goods
8.7%
Computer Software
8.7%
Telecommunications
4.3%
Other
34.8%
Discussions
CodeScan has no discussions with answers
Veracode Application Security Platform has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
