Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare CoderPad and Triplebyte Screen 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
LuGo-Test
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (48.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 2 Interviews Per Month
$0
CoderPad
Star Rating
(368)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 2 Interviews Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansTriplebyte Screen
Star Rating
(39)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0
Learn more about Triplebyte ScreenSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that CoderPad excels in its technical screening capabilities, with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for companies focused on coding assessments. In contrast, Triplebyte Screen, while still effective, has a lower score of 8.5 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Triplebyte Screen offers superior integrations, scoring 9.3 compared to CoderPad's 8.1. This makes Triplebyte a better option for teams looking to connect with various tools and platforms seamlessly.
- G2 users highlight the ease of use of Triplebyte Screen, which received a score of 9.7, indicating a more user-friendly experience compared to CoderPad's score of 9.0. This could be crucial for teams that prioritize a smooth onboarding process.
- Users on G2 report that CoderPad's performance is rated at 8.9, which is commendable, but Triplebyte Screen outshines it with a score of 9.4, suggesting a more reliable and efficient platform for coding assessments.
- Reviewers mention that CoderPad has a strong focus on coding development, scoring 8.8, which is beneficial for teams that require in-depth coding exercises. However, Triplebyte Screen's overall functionality, including its reporting features, scored higher at 8.9, indicating a more comprehensive tool for assessment.
- Users say that while both platforms offer good support, CoderPad's quality of support is rated at 8.7, slightly lower than Triplebyte Screen's 8.8, suggesting that users may find more responsive assistance with Triplebyte.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CoderPad
Free
Free
2 Interviews Per Month
Suited for teams who occasionally need to screen or interview developers.
- Interview in a real IDE
- Unlimited Users
- 99+ Languages & Frameworks
Triplebyte Screen
Free Forever
$0
Triplebyte Screen is Free to use for all hiring teams (there's no upsell!)
After the test, engineers have an option to join the Triplebyte community of over 300K engineers (completely optional and private). Our core business is to build a better LinkedIn for engineers, thus our business model allows us to offer this product for free. It’s a win-win.
Free Trial
CoderPad
Free Trial is available
Triplebyte Screen
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
193
8.3
21
Ease of Use
9.0
196
9.7
21
Ease of Setup
9.0
77
9.3
10
Ease of Admin
9.1
67
9.5
10
Quality of Support
8.7
124
8.8
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
62
9.6
8
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
191
7.9
17
Features by Category
Platform Basics
7.8
71
9.3
5
8.0
75
9.2
6
8.8
128
9.4
8
Platform Content
7.9
73
Not enough data
8.0
95
8.0
5
8.3
99
7.5
6
9.1
137
8.5
9
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
8.9
6
Platform Additional Functionality
8.6
98
9.0
10
Feature Not Available
8.5
9
7.8
81
Not enough data
7.7
72
Not enough data
7.0
87
Not enough data
7.8
72
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
CoderPad and Triplebyte Screen are categorized as Technical Skills Screening
Unique Categories
CoderPad has no unique categories
Triplebyte Screen has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
CoderPad
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Triplebyte Screen
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
32.4%
Information Technology and Services
19.3%
Internet
4.2%
Financial Services
3.8%
Insurance
3.4%
Other
37.0%
Computer Software
45.9%
Information Technology and Services
13.5%
Insurance
10.8%
Real Estate
5.4%
Retail
2.7%
Other
21.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
Can you run code in CoderPad?
2 Comments
SI
Yes and I often use it to show code in occasions other than interviews (like training, etc)Read more
How do i become better without learning hard ! ;)
1 Comment
Official Response from CodinGame For Work
Hi Olivier. Great discussion you're opening here and thank you for this! Although Codingame is the number one platform for improving your skills in a fun...Read more
How does Triplebyte work?
1 Comment
DM
Triplebyte Screen is one tool they provide - it lets you send programming and related tests to job applicants and then shares their percentile scores with...Read more
Triplebyte Screen has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
