Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare CodeRabbit and GitHub

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit
Star Rating
(26)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (92.3% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
Browse all 4 pricing plans
GitHub
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,264)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.1, which allows seamless connections with various tools and services, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for extensive collaboration options. In contrast, CodeRabbit, while also strong in Integrations with a score of 9.2, is noted for its more user-friendly interface, which reviewers mention enhances the overall experience.
  • Reviewers mention that GitHub's Quality of Support is rated at 8.7, which some users feel could be improved, especially during peak times. On the other hand, CodeRabbit shines with a score of 9.7 in this area, with users praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, making it a more reliable option for urgent issues.
  • G2 users highlight GitHub's Ease of Use at 8.7, which is generally favorable, but some users report a steeper learning curve for new developers. In contrast, CodeRabbit boasts a higher score of 9.6, with users saying that its intuitive design significantly reduces onboarding time for new team members.
  • Users on G2 report that GitHub's Deployment-Ready Staging feature scores 9.0, which is beneficial for teams needing robust staging environments. However, CodeRabbit's similar feature is noted for its simplicity and effectiveness, leading to a slightly lower score of 8.9, but users appreciate its ease of setup.
  • Reviewers mention that GitHub's Task Management capabilities score 8.9, which some users find adequate but lacking in advanced features. In contrast, CodeRabbit's task management is highlighted for its comprehensive tools and user-friendly interface, leading to a score of 9.0, making it a better fit for teams that prioritize project tracking.
  • Users say that GitHub's Documentation is rated at 8.7, which is helpful but can sometimes be overwhelming due to the volume of information. CodeRabbit, however, receives praise for its clear and concise Documentation, scoring 9.0, with users reporting that it significantly aids in understanding the software's functionalities.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CodeRabbit
Free
Free Trial
Browse all 4 pricing plans
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Free Trial
CodeRabbit
Free Trial is available
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
22
9.3
1,962
Ease of Use
9.4
25
8.7
1,978
Ease of Setup
9.6
20
9.0
589
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.7
450
Quality of Support
8.9
17
8.8
1,569
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.9
386
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
22
8.9
1,914
Features by Category
Application Release OrchestrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
8.7
157
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
8.6
53
Administration
Not enough data
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Analysis
Not enough data
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Testing
Not enough data
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
10.0
14
Cloud Infrastructure AutomationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
8.8
108
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
97
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.9
91
IT Management
Not enough data
9.0
99
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
8.8
258
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Management
Not enough data
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
8.8
210
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Software Composition AnalysisHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
8.8
84
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
9.2
77
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
75
Not enough data
8.8
149
Management
Not enough data
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
136
Not enough data
8.6
133
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Processes
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
138
Continuous IntegrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
8.5
236
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Management
Not enough data
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
8.6
201
Documentation
Not enough data
8.8
184
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Security
Not enough data
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
92.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
7.7%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
0%
GitHub
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
45.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
24.0%
Reviewers' Industry
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit
Computer Software
50.0%
Information Technology and Services
15.4%
Financial Services
11.5%
Telecommunications
3.8%
Program Development
3.8%
Other
15.4%
GitHub
GitHub
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Alternatives
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit Alternatives
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Add Bitbucket
GitLab
GitLab
Add GitLab
Harness Platform
Harness Platform
Add Harness Platform
Azure DevOps Server
Azure DevOps Server
Add Azure DevOps Server
GitHub
GitHub Alternatives
GitLab
GitLab
Add GitLab
Harness Platform
Harness Platform
Add Harness Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Add Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Jenkins
Jenkins
Add Jenkins
Discussions
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
CodeRabbit has no discussions with answers
GitHub
GitHub Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code - use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases - lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
Mohanendra S.
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
Jagadeesh V.
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more